-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 923
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Tests] BWC test improvements #1447
Conversation
There were a couple issues related the BWC that was not supported within the current iteration of the BWC script. This fixes the following: * Format of files being saved with color looks unreadable in txt form * Exit code not being cypress exit code which would be the amount of errors. * Issue because texts would fail but would return 0 to test runner because the script worked * CI test runner expects to be able to call the same files twice (security:no-security) * Issue because results for both were saved at the same time while original it was wiped clean * Support from 'Playground' environments * Source to actually call the script * wget not available in CI runner * Track PID of process instead of greping since greping was not reliable. * OpenSearch config setup Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! I'm just curious about a couple things for context and I have some suggestions for naming.
Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great Rocky! Thanks for continuing to improve these tests, much appreciated.
Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kawika Avilla <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
There were a couple issues related the BWC that was not supported
within the current iteration of the BWC script.
This fixes the following:
Issues Resolved
#1392
Check List
yarn test:jest
yarn test:jest_integration
yarn test:ftr