-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
versioning #113
Merged
Merged
versioning #113
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bloodearnest
force-pushed
the
versioning
branch
5 times, most recently
from
November 22, 2023 21:13
222127d
to
f83d71c
Compare
bloodearnest
force-pushed
the
versioning
branch
3 times, most recently
from
November 27, 2023 14:02
86be1a0
to
0d1196f
Compare
evansd
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is all very exciting. Sorry for taking so long to review. Beyond removing a couple of stray .swp
files I don't have suggestions at this point.
This new version is based on 22.04 and python3.10, and has an up to date version of all python packages. The versioning scheme is arbitrary major version, e.g. v1, v2, etc. The previous image is retained as v1, and the new image is v2. This move from maintaining 1 to 2 images requires some refactoring. Each major version has its own directory, and associated configuration files to track dependencies. They both share the same parameterised `Dockerfile` and `docker-compose.yaml`. In the process, I have also improved the local development tooling: - move from Makefile to parameterised justfile - some small reording of Dockerfile steps for efficiency and reuse - a proper solution for user the docker images themselves to add new dependencies and/or upgrade existing ones. This means you a) do not need all the python versions installed on your machine and b) this can be built on macos, in theory.
The github workflows have been updated to publish the v1 image as *both* `v1` and `latest` tags for now, as well as under the jupyter alias. The `v2` is published separately as just `v2`.
Used in docker image label and tag Refactored publishing script too.
This can be enhanced as needed, but the basic versions and tooling is there. Jinja2 is installed in the images, so we re-use the images themselves to render the template.
- Completely new user-facing README.md content - DEVELOPERS.md with playbook style info - Issue template for requesting packages
Seems like a useful thing to bundle documentation.
Also, updated missed rendering of v1/packages.md
Also, switch from generic end-user package `jupyter` package to specific packages we need. This drops the dependency on qtconsole.
bloodearnest
force-pushed
the
versioning
branch
from
December 11, 2023 11:59
a34a5a6
to
ddeb428
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #112