Support keyof keyword
#91
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
What do you mean by "it's all generic"? I think a type operator is probably a hood idea, since the RHS might have zo be a type literal rather than any expression. |
knutwannheden
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2023
Co-authored-by: Knut Wannheden <[email protected]>
Oh, sorry, I mean maybe it's more generic to use a Unary |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #90
currently, we have a model
TypeOperatorfor type-operator, but I think it may be better to use aUnaryto present type-operator since it's more generic.