Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix hyperlinks in random_ray.rst #3064

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

Fix hyperlinks in random_ray.rst #3064

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions docs/source/methods/random_ray.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Random Ray
What is Random Ray?
-------------------

`Random ray <Tramm-2017a>`_ is a stochastic transport method, closely related to
`Random ray <Tramm-2017a_>`_ is a stochastic transport method, closely related to
the deterministic Method of Characteristics (MOC) [Askew-1972]_. Rather than
each ray representing a single neutron as in Monte Carlo, it represents a
characteristic line through the simulation geometry upon which the transport
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Random Ray Numerical Derivation

In this section, we will derive the numerical basis for the random ray solver
mode in OpenMC. The derivation of random ray is also discussed in several papers
(`1 <Tramm-2017a>`_, `2 <Tramm-2017b>`_, `3 <Tramm-2018>`_), and some of those
(`1 <Tramm-2017a_>`_, `2 <Tramm-2017b_>`_, `3 <Tramm-2018_>`_), and some of those
derivations are reproduced here verbatim. Several extensions are also made to
add clarity, particularly on the topic of OpenMC's treatment of cell volumes in
the random ray solver.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ of terms. Mathematically, such cancellation allows us to arrive at the following

This derivation appears mathematically sound at first glance but unfortunately
raises a serious issue as discussed in more depth by `Tramm et al.
<Tramm-2020>`_ and `Cosgrove and Tramm <Cosgrove-2023>`_. Namely, the second
<Tramm-2020_>`_ and `Cosgrove and Tramm <Cosgrove-2023_>`_. Namely, the second
term:

.. math::
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ guess can be made by taking the isotropic source from the FSR the ray was
sampled in, direct usage of this quantity would result in significant bias and
error being imparted on the simulation.

Thus, an `on-the-fly approximation method <Tramm-2017a>`_ was developed (known
Thus, an `on-the-fly approximation method <Tramm-2017a_>`_ was developed (known
as the "dead zone"), where the first several mean free paths of a ray are
considered to be "inactive" or "read only". In this sense, the angular flux is
solved for using the MOC equation, but the ray does not "tally" any scalar flux
Expand Down