-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inject requestHeaderModifier to LuaData #223
Inject requestHeaderModifier to LuaData #223
Conversation
...ustomNetworkProvider/lua_configuration/networking.istio.io/VirtualService/trafficRouting.lua
Show resolved
Hide resolved
PTAL @furykerry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@zmberg PTAL |
@lujiajing1126 please squash the commits into one |
* fix lua script and test case * use ptr instead of struct * add requestHeaderModifier to testcase debugging toolkit Signed-off-by: Megrez Lu <[email protected]>
008562a
to
34a1848
Compare
Squashed. But I suppose maintainers can always merge and squash while merging the Pull Request on GitHub |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: zmberg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
In
TrafficRoutingStrategy
struct,RequestHeaderModifier
is allowed to be used for request header modification.But this field was not actually injected to the LuaData. Thus it cannot be used in the script.
Istio also supports HeaderOperations,
https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/virtual-service/#Headers-HeaderOperations
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
Ⅲ. Special notes for reviews