Optimize Advanced DaemonSet internal new pod for imitating scheduling #1011
Conversation
Signed-off-by: FillZpp <[email protected]>
| newPod := &corev1.Pod{Spec: ds.Spec.Template.Spec, ObjectMeta: ds.Spec.Template.ObjectMeta} | ||
| newPod.Namespace = ds.Namespace | ||
| newPod.Spec.NodeName = nodeName | ||
| // no need to set nodeName |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
since we're confident that pod for ds not exist here, plz consider using newPodForDSCache. LoadOrStore so that we don't have to maintain newPodForDSLock
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, only LoadOrStore might have multiple NewPod to be create and store, for this is not only called in reconcile, but also event handler.
| @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ func add(mgr manager.Manager, r reconcile.Reconciler) error { | |||
| ds := e.Object.(*appsv1alpha1.DaemonSet) | |||
| klog.V(4).Infof("Deleting DaemonSet %s/%s", ds.Namespace, ds.Name) | |||
| dsc.expectations.DeleteExpectations(keyFunc(ds)) | |||
| newPodForDSCache.Delete(ds.UID) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
plz delete entry of ds.UID if daemonset is not found in the beginning of Reconcile()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Emm.. I can't do that, for there is no UID since daemonset is not found. Delete handler should be enough.
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: FillZpp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…openkruise#1011) Signed-off-by: FillZpp <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Liu Zhenwei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: FillZpp [email protected]
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
Optimize Advanced DaemonSet internal new pod for imitating scheduling