adds proposal for charter submission & review per #200 #405
Conversation
| ## How would success be measured? | ||
|
|
||
| * speed and thoroughness of charter review - we have ~30 project charters to assess in the coming months related to onboarding | ||
| * ease of review - the process should be relatively frictionless where there are no concerns |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should track progress with some tool, 30 are a LOT!
| * Reviewing CPC members have added themselves as reviewers on the issue and approved. | ||
| * More than 50% of voting CPC members have approved, OR | ||
| * More than 2/3 of all CPC members have approved, OR | ||
| * A period of 14 days has elapsed with no concerns or objections raised. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This https://github.com/openjs-foundation/cross-project-council/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#aproving-project-charters in the governance doc says:
The request is approved when:
there are no outstanding objections
there are two or more approvals by voting CPC members
the board has been consulted in the case of substantial changes
The issue has been open for at least 14 days
I'd suggest we use that, and possibly just link to that so we don't need to maintain in 2 places
|
Seems like this proposal got forgotten about. Considering we are already approving of charters do we still need this formalized to this extent? |
|
@jorydotcom link looks perfect. |
Adds a charter submission and review process to address this need for project onboarding.