-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: Stingray 2: A fast and modern Python library for spectral timing #7389
Comments
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
Review checklist for @warrickballConflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
|
This submission has already been reviewed by pyOpenSci: pyOpenSci/software-submission#201 |
Post-Review Checklist for Editor and AuthorsAdditional Author Tasks After Review is Complete
Editor Tasks Prior to Acceptance
|
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.1490116 as archive |
Done! archive is now 10.5281/zenodo.1490116 |
@editorialbot set v2.1 as version |
Done! version is now v2.1 |
@warrickball please note that the version that received the review is 2.1, but the version including the changes made as part of the pyOpenSci review is 2.2 (which will be released tomorrow). |
Here is the new release: https://github.com/StingraySoftware/stingray/releases/tag/v2.2 |
And the release on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/13974481 |
@editorialbot set v2.2 as version |
Done! version is now v2.2 |
Submitting author: @matteobachetti (Matteo Bachetti)
Repository: https://github.com/stingraysoftware/stingray
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): update_joss_paper
Version: v2.2
Editor: @warrickball
Reviewers: @warrickball
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.1490116
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@warrickball, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @warrickball know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @warrickball
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: