[PRE REVIEW]: Mozzie: a computationally efficient simulator for the spatio-temporal modelling of mosquitoes

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @WilkAndy (Andy Wilkins)
Repository: https://github.com/csiro-risk-assessment/mozzie
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @mengqi-z
Reviewers: @emilydolson, @slwu89
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e22c754262ed8682c3f010c530917989"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e22c754262ed8682c3f010c530917989/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e22c754262ed8682c3f010c530917989/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/e22c754262ed8682c3f010c530917989)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @WilkAndy. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@WilkAndy if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1093/femspd/fty059 is OK
- 10.1186/s12936-018-2442-y is OK
- 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.2_suppl.0750001 is OK
- 10.1111/1365-2664.12133 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13318 is OK
- 10.1007/s12080-022-00528-y is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0297964 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0194573 is OK
- 10.1186/s12936-018-2197-5 is OK
- 10.1186/1475-2875-8-223 is OK
- 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.11.013 is OK
- 10.1016/j.camwa.2013.03.024 is OK
- 10.1016/j.matcom.2017.10.012 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0151217 is OK
- 10.1186/s13071-018-2829-1 is OK
- 10.1186/s13071-020-04426-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jde.2020.04.034 is OK
- 10.1007/s00285-023-02031-2 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009526 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110072 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2010.118 is OK
- 10.25919/2t8h-5k81 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010684 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010863 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.07.051 is OK
- 10.1038/ncomms4977 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Gaps in Globular Cluster Streams: Pal 5 and the Ga...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Skeeter Buster: a stochastic, spatially explicit m...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1101/2023.09.09.556958 may be a valid DOI for title: MGDrivE 3: A decoupled vector-human framework for ...
- 10.1080/17513750902803588 may be a valid DOI for title: A note on the nonautonomous delay Beverton–Holt mo...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.16 s (916.4 files/s, 129499.4 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           54           1338            976           6767
CSV                              61             30              0           5561
Cython                           12            826           1159           2423
TeX                               6            171              0            888
C                                 2             38             26            478
Markdown                          3            142              0            296
Bourne Shell                      8             35              4             65
YAML                              1              1              4             25
C/C++ Header                      1             16             29             15
Bourne Again Shell                1              3             13              4
CMake                             1              0              0              4
DOS Batch                         1              0              0              1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            151           2600           2211          16527
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   322	WilkAndy
   106	nickbeeton
    11	Nick Beeton
     5	Keith R Hayes
     4	Maud El-Hachem
     3	ghosack
     1	Andy Wilkins

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1286

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

MetaWards: A flexible metapopulation framework for modelling disease spread
Submitting author: @chryswoods
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @klmedeiros, @acolum
Similarity score: 0.6775

Cacatoo: building, exploring, and sharing spatially structured models of biological systems
Submitting author: @bramvandijk88
Handling editor: @Bisaloo (Retired)
Reviewers: @emilydolson, @TimKam
Similarity score: 0.6718

EvoDynamics.jl: a framework for modeling eco-evolutionary dynamics
Submitting author: @kavir1698
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @slwu89, @tijeco
Similarity score: 0.6655

Viable North Sea (ViNoS): A NetLogo Agent-based Model of German Small-scale Fisheries
Submitting author: @platipodium
Handling editor: @marcosvital (Active)
Reviewers: @nick-gauthier, @Fabbiologia, @changliao1025
Similarity score: 0.6540

REvoSim v3: A fast evolutionary simulation tool with ecological processes
Submitting author: @Euan-Furness
Handling editor: @Bisaloo (Retired)
Reviewers: @bramvandijk88, @emilydolson
Similarity score: 0.6519

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @mengqi-z as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@mengqi-z I was wondering if you could help edit this submission. It may be somewhat off topic, but I figured your geospatial research expertise may be applicable.

[WilkAndy]

Confirming that:

- 10.1101/2023.09.09.556958 may be a valid DOI for title: MGDrivE 3: A decoupled vector-human framework for ...
- 10.1080/17513750902803588 may be a valid DOI for title: A note on the nonautonomous delay Beverton–Holt mo...

are correct DOIs.

[mengqi-z]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @mengqi-z is now the editor

[mengqi-z]

👋 @kerguler @dinacmistry @GilChrist19 @yafeiwang89 - Would any of you be interested and available to review this submission for JOSS? The review process is straightforward, handled through GitHub issues, and follows a checklist-driven approach: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If you are unable to take on this review, I would greatly appreciate any recommendations for other potential reviewers with relevant expertise.

[mengqi-z]

👋 @jkbren @emilydolson @chryswoods @bramvandijk88 - Would you be willing and available to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[bramvandijk88]

Maybe a little later this fall, but not for the next few weeks, sorry 😔

[emilydolson]

I would be happy to!

[mengqi-z]

@editorialbot add @emilydolson as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@emilydolson added to the reviewers list!

[mengqi-z]

Maybe a little later this fall, but not for the next few weeks, sorry 😔

That's totally fine! Thank you for getting back to me so quickly, I really appreciate it!

[chryswoods]

Sorry - I'm on leave now for a bit and won't be able to make time to review.

[mengqi-z]

Sorry - I'm on leave now for a bit and won't be able to make time to review.

@chryswoods No worries! Thanks for letting me know.

[mengqi-z]

👋 @agmunozs @SimonbJohnson @agerada @kathlandgren - Would any of you be available to review this submission for JOSS? Given your background, I believe you'd be a great fit to review this paper.

JOSS uses a checklist-driven review process, which you can find here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

If you're unable to review, any recommendations for other potential reviewers with relevant expertise would also be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

[agmunozs]

Hi, sorry. Too busy at the momentt!

…

Ángel .G Muñoz, PhD (he/him) Senior Scientist | Ramón y Cajal Fellow Leader - Climate Services Team (CST) Earth System Services <https://ess.bsc.es/> Group | Earth Sciences Department Barcelona Supercomputing Center - Centro Nacional de Supercomputación (BSC-CNS) Address: C/ Jordi Girona, 31, 08034 Barcelona, Spain | Torre Girona, 2nd Floor Personal Website: Ángel G. Muñoz site <https://www.bsc.es/munoz-solorzano-angel-garikoitz>Email: ***@***.*** Twitter: @agmunozs <https://twitter.com/agmunozs?lang=es> On 30 Sep 2024, at 19:54, Mengqi Zhao ***@***.***> wrote: 👋 @agmunozs <https://github.com/agmunozs> @SimonbJohnson <https://github.com/SimonbJohnson> @agerada <https://github.com/agerada> @kathlandgren <https://github.com/kathlandgren> - Would any of you be available to review this submission for JOSS? Given your background, I believe you'd be a great fit to review this paper. JOSS uses a checklist-driven review process, which you can find here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html If you're unable to review, any recommendations for other potential reviewers with relevant expertise would also be greatly appreciated. Thank you! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7230 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGRZTBSNEJPJO3D6GBRSPN3ZZGF6JAVCNFSM6AAAAABOJFQQNSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOBTHAZTCMBQGU>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

[mengqi-z]

@agmunozs Thank you for letting me know - completely understand!

[mengqi-z]

👋 @VincentStimper @jabirali @zoometh - Would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

JOSS uses a checklist-driven review process, which you can find here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[jabirali]

@mengqi-z It looks interesting, but unfortunately my hands are a bit full at the moment so I can’t provide a review in reasonable time.

[zoometh]

@mengqi-z sorry to decline, I'm really behind schedule these days. I cannot do it.

[mengqi-z]

@jabirali @zoometh - No problem at all. Thanks for getting back to me!

[mengqi-z]

👋 @slwu89 @smitdave @Chipdelmal - Would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

JOSS uses a checklist-driven review process, which you can find here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[slwu89]

Hi @mengqi-z yes I am able to review.

[mengqi-z]

@editorialbot add @slwu89 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@slwu89 added to the reviewers list!

[mengqi-z]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7324.