[PRE REVIEW]: capesData: Data on Scholarships in CAPES International Mobility Programs

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @leobiazoli (Leonardo Biazoli)
Repository: https://github.com/leobiazoli/capesData
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v0.0.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/51cf027bff2a0ff06924f9973bb767c8"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/51cf027bff2a0ff06924f9973bb767c8/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/51cf027bff2a0ff06924f9973bb767c8/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/51cf027bff2a0ff06924f9973bb767c8)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @leobiazoli. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@leobiazoli if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[leobiazoli]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[leobiazoli]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @leobiazoli, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[leobiazoli]

@editorialbot set capesData-paper as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now capesData-paper

[leobiazoli]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[leobiazoli]

@editorialbot set main as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now main

[leobiazoli]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

covid19.analytics: An R Package to Obtain, Analyze and Visualize Data from the 2019 Coronavirus Disease Pandemic
Submitting author: @mponce0
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @LogIN-, @JDRomano2
Similarity score: 0.6821

covidregionaldata: Subnational data for COVID-19 epidemiology
Submitting author: @joseph-palmer
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @mponce0, @federicomarini
Similarity score: 0.6803

REDCapTidieR: Extracting complex REDCap databases into tidy tables
Submitting author: @rsh52
Handling editor: @mikemahoney218 (Active)
Reviewers: @RhysPeploe, @spgarbet
Similarity score: 0.6716

localcovid19now: processing and mapping COVID-19 case data at subnational scales
Submitting author: @sjbeckett
Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active)
Reviewers: @richelbilderbeek, @mbkumar, @welch16, @Epic19mz
Similarity score: 0.6656

gcamfaostat: An R package to prepare, process, and synthesize FAOSTAT data for global agroeconomic and multisector dynamic modeling
Submitting author: @realxinzhao
Handling editor: @hugoledoux (Active)
Reviewers: @klau506, @HenriKajasilta
Similarity score: 0.6644

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.01 s (1092.3 files/s, 68086.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         3             46              0            165
TeX                              1             15              0            143
YAML                             3             20              5             81
Rmd                              1             24             36             18
R                                4             10            173             12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            12            115            214            419
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    49	Leonardo Biazoli
    14	Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1364

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license

[arfon]

@editorialbot reject

@leobiazoli - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after review by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort criterion.

One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.