[PRE REVIEW]: Metasyn: Transparent Generation of Synthetic Tabular Data with Privacy Guarantees

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @vankesteren (Erik-Jan van Kesteren)
Repository: https://github.com/sodascience/metasyn
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.2
Editor: @crvernon
Reviewers: @PetrKorab, @misken
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/43fd4234e18bfd94b952aea35db8b883"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/43fd4234e18bfd94b952aea35db8b883/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/43fd4234e18bfd94b952aea35db8b883/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/43fd4234e18bfd94b952aea35db8b883)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vankesteren. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@vankesteren if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.7697217 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v059.i10 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: ONS methodology working paper series number 16—Syn...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Differential privacy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Statistical disclosure control
- No DOI given, and none found for title: k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Guidelines for Output Checking. Eurostat
- 10.29012/jpc.v1i2.570 may be a valid DOI for title: Differential privacy for statistics: What we know ...
- 10.1007/bf02985802 may be a valid DOI for title: The elements of statistical learning: data mining,...
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38 may be a valid DOI for title: Information theory and an extension of the maximum...
- 10.1002/wics.199 may be a valid DOI for title: The Bayesian information criterion: background, de...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: synthpop: Bespoke creation of synthetic data in R
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Simulation of synthetic complex data: The R packag...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Datasynthesizer: Privacy-preserving synthetic data...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: To democratize research with sensitive data, we sh...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.08 s (1246.2 files/s, 288667.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                              5              0              0          11376
Python                          40            931           1409           3146
JSON                             3              1              0            767
reStructuredText                28            746           1002            639
Markdown                         4            118              0            351
TOML                             5             48              3            243
TeX                              1             13              0            148
YAML                             5             20             23            144
SVG                              5              0              0             98
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           1789             68
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              6              7             11
Dockerfile                       1              6              7              8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           100           1897           4241          17025
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    95	qubixes
    34	Erik-Jan van Kesteren
    29	Samuwhale
    26	Samuel
    13	Raoul Schram

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2230

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation
Submitting author: @assignUser
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @gagolews, @brunaw
Similarity score: 0.6500

Copulas.jl: A fully Distributions.jl-compliant copula package
Submitting author: @lrnv
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @lucaferranti, @AnderGray
Similarity score: 0.6431

verdata: An R package for analyzing data from the Truth Commission in Colombia
Submitting author: @thegargiulian
Handling editor: @Nikoleta-v3 (Active)
Reviewers: @jamesmbaazam, @JosiahParry
Similarity score: 0.6322

PyNM: a Lightweight Python implementation of Normative Modeling
Submitting author: @harveyaa
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @smkia, @saigerutherford
Similarity score: 0.6316

Contextualized: Heterogeneous Modeling Toolbox
Submitting author: @cnellington
Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active)
Reviewers: @holl-, @pescap
Similarity score: 0.6288

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[crvernon]

👋 @vankesteren - thanks for your submission to JOSS. While I find you a topic editor, please reduce the word count of your paper to at or under 1000 words. Thanks!

[vankesteren]

Ah sorry, in editing the paper further I forgot about the word count limit! I'll do my best to do this by next week.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

I think I'll just manage this review myself. Let me get you two reviewers and we will kick things off.

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor

[crvernon]

👋 @PetrKorab - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[crvernon]

👋 @KennethEnevoldsen - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[PetrKorab]

@crvernon Yes, sure👍

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @PetrKorab as reviewer

Thanks @PetrKorab! I will kick this off once we confirm one more reviewer.

[editorialbot]

@PetrKorab added to the reviewers list!

[vankesteren]

In case you still need it, I looked up a few people on the JOSS reviewer list and these suggestions came up:

• misken
• prdm0

[KennethEnevoldsen]

@crvernon, sadly, I have a lot on my plate until mid-September, but after that, I am open to doing this review.

[crvernon]

Thanks for the fast notice @KennethEnevoldsen!

[crvernon]

👋 @misken - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[misken]

Yep, I can review this submission.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @misken as reviewer

Thanks @misken!

[editorialbot]

@misken added to the reviewers list!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot start review

👋 - Alright @vankesteren, @PetrKorab, and @misken - I am going to close this Pre-Review and kick off the full review which you should receive a notification for. Thanks!

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7099.