[PRE REVIEW]: dust_extinction: Interstellar Dust Extinction Models

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @karllark (Karl Gordon)
Repository: https://github.com/karllark/dust_extinction
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.4.1
Editor: @ivastar
Reviewers: @TheSkyentist, @keflavich
Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42619ff7078a218d14893ff2da4f6ca6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42619ff7078a218d14893ff2da4f6ca6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42619ff7078a218d14893ff2da4f6ca6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42619ff7078a218d14893ff2da4f6ca6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @karllark. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@karllark if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.05 s (979.5 files/s, 196122.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          25           1584           2748           2650
reStructuredText                15            447            668            659
TeX                              1             23              0            361
DOS Batch                        1             21              1            150
YAML                             3             17             46            137
make                             1             22              5            106
Markdown                         1             13              0             69
INI                              1             11              0             66
TOML                             1              2              0              5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            49           2140           3468           4203
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   295	Karl Gordon
    92	Karl D. Gordon
    14	Kristen Larson
     7	aidantmcb
     4	P. L. Lim
     3	krislars
     2	Brigitta Sipocz
     1	Aidan McBride
     1	Pey Lian Lim
     1	sohamvg

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 609

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 is OK
- 10.1086/167900 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201015292 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbe is OK
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 is OK
- 10.1086/191413 is OK
- 10.1086/316293 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0401344 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a is OK
- 10.1086/376774 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1320 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b7 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c2 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201321686 is OK
- 10.1086/173713 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201423439 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141042 is OK
- 10.1086/424922 is OK
- 10.1086/318651 is OK
- 10.1086/382351 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Narrow band multicolor photometry of reddened and ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Interstellar dust models for extinction and emissi...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Expanded Sample of Small Magellanic Cloud Ultravio...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[dfm]

@karllark — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[karllark]

No problem. I've waited a few years to get this paper written, I guess I can wait a little bit for an editor. ;-)

[dfm]

@editorialbot invite @ivastar as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

☝ to generate the most similar paper recommendation list which has been broken for some time.

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars
Submitting author: @s-goldman
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey
Similarity score: 0.8488

A-SLOTH: Ancient Stars and Local Observables by Tracing Halos
Submitting author: @HartwigTilman
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @gregbryan, @kaleybrauer
Similarity score: 0.8148

ExoTiC-ISM: A Python package for marginalised exoplanet transit parameters across a grid of systematic instrument models
Submitting author: @ivalaginja
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @hayesla, @mattpitkin
Similarity score: 0.8147

HostPhot: global and local photometry of galaxies hosting supernovae or other transients
Submitting author: @temuller
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Onoddil, @krachyon
Similarity score: 0.8079

coronagraph: Telescope Noise Modeling for Exoplanets in Python
Submitting author: @jlustigy
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @lpueyo
Similarity score: 0.8074

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[ivastar]

@editorialbot assign @ivastar as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @ivastar is now the editor

[ivastar]

Hi @karllark glad to see this submitted! I'm going to look for reviewers the next week or so. Let me know if you have recommendations.

[karllark]

I don't have any particular suggestions. I can think about it. Should the suggestions come from those already signed up to be JOSS reviewers or can the be anyone?

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[ivastar]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @ivastar, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer

# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor

# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor

# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a 
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository

# Set a value for the archive DOI
@editorialbot set 10.5281/zenodo.6861996 as archive

# Mention the EiCs for the correct track
@editorialbot ping track-eic

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

# Creates a post-review checklist with editor and authors tasks
@editorialbot create post-review checklist

# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review

[ivastar]

@editorialbot add @TheSkyentist as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@TheSkyentist added to the reviewers list!

[ivastar]

@editorialbot add @keflavich as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@keflavich added to the reviewers list!

[ivastar]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7023.