Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: pivmet: an R package proposing pivotal methods for consensus clustering and mixture modelling #6363

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Feb 17, 2024 · 50 comments
Assignees
Labels
HTML pre-review R TeX Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Feb 17, 2024

Submitting author: @LeoEgidi (LEONARDO EGIDI)
Repository: https://github.com/LeoEgidi/pivmet
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master
Version: v0.5.0
Editor: @skanwal
Reviewers: @adriancorrendo, @larryshamalama
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27410f99af44fd07417b87b8ec193ef5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27410f99af44fd07417b87b8ec193ef5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27410f99af44fd07417b87b8ec193ef5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/27410f99af44fd07417b87b8ec193ef5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @LeoEgidi. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@LeoEgidi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning labels Feb 17, 2024
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: leoegidi/pivmet/paper

1 similar comment
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: leoegidi/pivmet/paper

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 17, 2024

@editorialbot set master as branch

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Done! branch is now master

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 17, 2024

@editorialbot check repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.12 s (218.3 files/s, 51389.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               14            441            941           2031
HTML                             2             70              5            983
TeX                              2             76              0            518
Markdown                         4            108              0            305
Rmd                              3            187            245            206
YAML                             1              1              1              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            26            883           1192           4046
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1196

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Failed to discover a valid open source license

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 17, 2024

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

Hi, thanks.
What is the problem with generating the pdf? Should I do something?
Let me know about the further steps, thanks a lot.

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

@editorialbot commands

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello @LeoEgidi, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

@editorialbot generate preprint

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

I list here a possible reviewer:
Larry Dong

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

medoutcon: Nonparametric efficient causal mediation analysis with machine learning in R
Submitting author: @nhejazi
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @erikcs, @rrrlw
Similarity score: 0.8174

metrica: an R package to evaluate prediction performance of regression and classification point-forecast models
Submitting author: @adriancorrendo
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @wiljnich, @simonpcouch
Similarity score: 0.8138

fmcmc: A friendly MCMC framework
Submitting author: @gvegayon
Handling editor: @arokem (Retired)
Reviewers: @fabian-s
Similarity score: 0.8134

Empirical and non-parametric copula models with the cort R package
Submitting author: @lrnv
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @coatless, @agisga
Similarity score: 0.8133

The ppmData R-package for setting up spatial point process models
Submitting author: @skiptoniam
Handling editor: @elbeejay (Active)
Reviewers: @OwenWard, @mhesselbarth
Similarity score: 0.8115

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

@arfon Hi, is there anything I can do?

@arfon arfon added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Mar 3, 2024
@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Mar 3, 2024

@LeoEgidi – my apologies, I forgot to mention that we're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Mar 3, 2024

@editorialbot invite @skanwal as editor

👋 @skanwal – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 3, 2024

@arfon - yes, happy to take this on.

@LeoEgidi
Copy link

LeoEgidi commented Mar 4, 2024

@LeoEgidi – my apologies, I forgot to mention that we're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

Thanks a lot @arfon !

@skanwal skanwal self-assigned this Mar 8, 2024
@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 8, 2024

@editorialbot generate my checklist

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Checklists can only be created once the review has started in the review issue

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 8, 2024

Hi Lary @larryshamalama - will you be happy to review this submission?
PDF can be found here #6363 (comment).

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 8, 2024

Hi Adrian @adriancorrendo - will you be happy to review this submission?
PDF can be found here #6363 (comment).

@larryshamalama
Copy link

larryshamalama commented Mar 8, 2024

Hi Lary @larryshamalama - will you be happy to review this submission? PDF can be found here #6363 (comment).

Hi @skanwal, unfortunately, I am busy for the rest of the month. I would be happy to review this submission if I can do it sometime in April. Let me know if that works

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Mar 9, 2024

@arfon - yes, happy to take this on.

Great! @skanwal – next you need to assign yourself with @editorialbot assign me as editor

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Mar 9, 2024

@editorialbot assign @skanwal as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @skanwal is now the editor

@arfon arfon removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Mar 9, 2024
@adriancorrendo
Copy link

Hi Adrian @adriancorrendo - will you be happy to review this submission? PDF can be found here #6363 (comment).

Hi, @skanwal . Thanks for the invitation.
I'm interested in reviewing this.
Could you please remind me a reasonable timeline to complete the review?

Best regards,
Adrian

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 10, 2024

Thanks, @adriancorrendo.

Could you please remind me a reasonable timeline to complete the review?

4-6 weeks will be great if you can manage it.

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 10, 2024

Hi @larryshamalama

April sounds good to me. Please let me know of any issues.

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 10, 2024

@editorialbot add @adriancorrendo as reviewer.

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@adriancorrendo added to the reviewers list!

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 10, 2024

@editorialbot add @larryshamalama as reviewer.

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@larryshamalama added to the reviewers list!

@skanwal
Copy link

skanwal commented Mar 10, 2024

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #6461.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
HTML pre-review R TeX Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants