Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[PRE REVIEW]: DUGseis: A Python Package for Real-Time and Post-Processing of Picoseismicity #6349

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 47 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: DUGseis: A Python Package for Real-Time and Post-Processing of Picoseismicity #6349

editorialbot opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 47 comments
Assignees
@ThomasLecocq @crvernon
Labels
C pre-review Python TeX Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Feb 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Submitting author: @mrosskopf (Martina Rosskopf)
Repository: https://github.com/swiss-seismological-service/DUGseis
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.3
Editor: @crvernon
Reviewers: @ThomasLecocq
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d6852782d77b87a4f45a0c2058d056c6)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mrosskopf. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mrosskopf if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology labels Feb 13, 2024
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author 

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.17 s (704.4 files/s, 138703.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          71           2479           3313          10703
SQL                              1            189              0           2016
Qt                               3              0              0           1558
XML                             15              0              0           1159
Markdown                        13            289              0            987
YAML                            13             80            180            675
TeX                              1             10              0             96
TOML                             1              6              1             70
C                                1             40             54             61
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           122           3105           3556          17361
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1331

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author 

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5880/GFZ.2.4.2020.003 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10054611 is OK
- 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 is OK
- 10.3390/s23063315 is OK
- 10.5194/se-13-301-2022 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.5194/se-11-627-2020 may be a valid DOI for title: Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2015.06.004 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- 10.5281/zenodo.10598393 is INVALID
- 10.3929/ethz-b-000651477 is INVALID

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

SeismicMesh: Triangular meshing for seismology
Submitting author: @krober10nd
Handling editor: @meg-simula (Retired)
Reviewers: @nschloe, @jorgensd
Similarity score: 0.8239

UWGeodynamics: A teaching and research tool for numerical geodynamic modelling
Submitting author: @rbeucher
Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired)
Reviewers: @flohorovicic
Similarity score: 0.8203

Telewavesim: Python software for teleseismic body wave modeling
Submitting author: @paudetseis
Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired)
Reviewers: @andreww, @seisman, @brmather
Similarity score: 0.8202

pySYD: Automated measurements of global asteroseismic parameters
Submitting author: @ashleychontos
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @danhey, @benjaminpope
Similarity score: 0.8189

DearEIS - A GUI program for analyzing impedance spectra
Submitting author: @vyrjana
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @Aslan-Kosakian, @mdmurbach
Similarity score: 0.8187

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Feb 13, 2024

Hi @mrosskopf and thanks for your submission! We have a backlog of submissions so I will add this to our waitlist. In the meantime, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them. Also please address the DOI notes above. Thanks for your patience.

@kthyng kthyng added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Feb 13, 2024
@mrosskopf
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@mrosskopf
Copy link

Hi @kthyng thank you for adding me to the waitlist. I addressed the DOI notes and hope all works now.
My suggestions for reviewers are:
ThomasLecocq, leonard-seydoux, fwalter, calum-chamberlain, seisman

Thank you again!

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Mar 20, 2024

Hi @mrosskopf! Another note — it would be great to add a readme to your repo to have something of a landing page for any potential users. I see you have info in your docs but it feels a bit empty without some info in the readme itself too.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Mar 20, 2024

Also still looking for an editor for you.

@mrosskopf
Copy link

Hi @kthyng, thank you for the note. I updated the readme in the repo.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Apr 10, 2024

@crvernon Are you up for editing another submission?

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Apr 10, 2024

@editorialbot invite @crvernon as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@crvernon
Copy link

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor

@crvernon crvernon removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Apr 12, 2024
@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @mrosskopf - I'll be your editor on this one. Once I get at least two reviews signed up I'll move this to full review status. Thanks!

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @ThomasLecocq - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @leonard-seydoux - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @calum-chamberlain - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@ThomasLecocq
Copy link

👋 @ThomasLecocq - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Yes

@crvernon
Copy link

Thanks @ThomasLecocq !

@crvernon
Copy link

@editorialbot add @ThomasLecocq as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ThomasLecocq added to the reviewers list!

@calum-chamberlain
Copy link

👋 @calum-chamberlain - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

Sorry, but I am flat out with teaching at the moment and won't be able to provide a timely review.

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @fwalter - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @rowanc1 - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @kwinkunks - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @nialov - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@fwalter
Copy link

fwalter commented Apr 30, 2024 via email

@crvernon
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

Hello @fwalter the command above will compile the paper in a following comment. We are in pre-review status now, which is where we ensure we have at least two reviewers to kick off the full review which is where the checklist is present and the full review takes place.

Are you able to review this submission? If so, I'll assign you and we can kick this off to full review.

Thanks!

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@crvernon
Copy link

crvernon commented May 3, 2024

👋 @SaumikDana - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@fwalter
Copy link

fwalter commented May 3, 2024 via email

@nialov
Copy link

nialov commented May 7, 2024

Sorry, I am too busy with prior reviews for a month or two. I can not take this one on my plate :(. So it is a no from me for the review.

@crvernon
Copy link

crvernon commented May 7, 2024

No problem @nialov thanks for the notice!

@crvernon
Copy link

crvernon commented May 7, 2024

👋 @AnantHariharan1996 - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@crvernon
Copy link

😅 @mrosskopf - I am working on getting you another reviewer, once I do we can get this kicked over to full review!

Hang in there @ThomasLecocq, we will get you something to review ASAP!

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @megies - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @trichter - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@AnantHariharan1996
Copy link

@crvernon Apologies for the delay in response. Thanks for the review offer, but I have a few other items to review currently and so I will have to decline this for now. Best wishes.

@megies
Copy link

megies commented May 21, 2024

@crvernon I'm sorry, I won't be able to review

@crvernon
Copy link

👋 @mrosskopf - having a crazy tough time finding you reviewers on this one. Any help would be appreciated.

In this case, I am going to go ahead and start the review with @ThomasLecocq confirmed so things can get moving. I'll find you another reviewer in parallel.

Thank you!

@crvernon
Copy link

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #6768.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ThomasLecocq ThomasLecocq

@crvernon crvernon

Labels
C pre-review Python TeX Track: 6 (ESE) Earth Sciences and Ecology
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
10 participants
@ThomasLecocq @megies @kthyng @crvernon @calum-chamberlain @fwalter @AnantHariharan1996 @nialov @editorialbot @mrosskopf