[PRE REVIEW]: StateLevelForest: An R package containing a century of U.S. forest dynamics

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @GatesDupont (Gaetan Dupont)
Repository: https://github.com/GatesDupont/StateLevelForest
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v0.1..0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c4870e2b4c2f9b0a46f061f58768950c"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c4870e2b4c2f9b0a46f061f58768950c/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c4870e2b4c2f9b0a46f061f58768950c/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c4870e2b4c2f9b0a46f061f58768950c)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @GatesDupont. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@GatesDupont if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.01 s (1036.6 files/s, 92124.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         4            125              0            375
TeX                              1              6              0             37
Rmd                              1             36             55             26
YAML                             1              1              4             18
R                                1              0             27              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             8            168             86            457
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 766

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.2737/wo-gtr-97 is OK
- 10.1126/science.1111772 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

RandomForestsGLS: An R package for Random Forests for dependent data
Submitting author: @ArkajyotiSaha
Handling editor: @fabian-s (Active)
Reviewers: @mnwright, @pdwaggoner
Similarity score: 0.8092

forestatrisk: a Python package for modelling and forecasting deforestation in the tropics
Submitting author: @ghislainv
Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired)
Reviewers: @molgor, @ethanwhite
Similarity score: 0.8076

covidregionaldata: Subnational data for COVID-19 epidemiology
Submitting author: @joseph-palmer
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @mponce0, @federicomarini
Similarity score: 0.8042

localcovid19now: processing and mapping COVID-19 case data at subnational scales
Submitting author: @sjbeckett
Handling editor: @galessiorob (Active)
Reviewers: @richelbilderbeek, @mbkumar, @welch16, @Epic19mz
Similarity score: 0.8031

home2park: An R package to assess the spatial provision of urban parks
Submitting author: @xp-song
Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active)
Reviewers: @aelissa, @nickbearman
Similarity score: 0.8030

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@GatesDupont thanks for this submission. Unfortunately this work is not in scope for JOSS as it stands. Please review our substantial scholarly effort criteria, for more on what constitutes an acceptable JOSS submission. JOSS publishes research software offering significant scientific research functionality. The work contained in this submission appears predominantly around the sharing and enabling of access to a data set. Although this work sounds useful/important in the job that it is doing, it does not constitute research software, and is hence out of scope for JOSS.

We will now proceed to reject this work given that it is not in scope.

You may want to consider other venues to enable citation of this work, such as ZENODO.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.