[PRE REVIEW]: AeroAcoustics.jl: A julia package for aeroacoustics #5912
Comments
|
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type: |
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
|
@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor Hi @faroit, could you handle this submission? I know you already have a few, and it would be ok to wait until one of those wraps up. |
|
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
|
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: RHEOS.jl -- A Julia Package for Rheology Data Analysis Oceananigans.jl: Fast and friendly geophysical fluid dynamics on GPUs GeophysicalFlows.jl: Solvers for geophysical fluid dynamics problems in periodic domains on CPUs & GPUs vSmartMOM.jl: an Open-Source Julia Package for Atmospheric Radiative Transfer and Remote Sensing Tools NuclearToolkit.jl: A Julia package for nuclear structure calculations |
|
Thank you for starting the pre-review. I understand that many of you are busy, and appreciate your time and effort! I've looked at potential reviewers in your list, and the following looks like very capable candidates: Potential reviewers, that have not signed up (yet), but would be really good: |
|
@kyleniemeyer i'm not an expert on Julia and also not very proficient in acoustics but I can take this once I have capacity (should be in the next 2 weeks) |
|
@editorialbot assign @faroit as editor |
|
Assigned! @faroit is now the editor |
kyleniemeyer
added
the
waitlisted
|
Hi all, just checking in since some time has passed. Do you have an estimation on when this can move forward? I understand that your effort is on voluntary basis, so thank you for doing it 🥇 |
|
Hello @faroit - are you able to get this moving on this review now? |
|
Hi @1oly thanks for waiting so long. I now have free capacity and will start the process of finding reviewers. |
faroit
removed
the
waitlisted
|
Hi @1oly sorry again for the long waiting time 🙇 Thank you already for providing a list of reviewers with domain knowledge. In addition to your proposal in #5912 (comment) I would also like to ask the following julia audio devs:
Can you please check all of them are ok wrt the JOSS COI policy? |
|
👋 @thejasvibr @svchb @ssfrr @jfsantos @nantonel - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html The software under review is a julia package https://github.com/1oly/AeroAcoustics.jl This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place. |
|
@faroit You seem to have the packages mixed up?? But I would be willing to review https://github.com/1oly/AeroAcoustics.jl |
|
Sounds very interesting. I'd be happy to be a reviewer for this package.
…On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, 11:31 PM Fabian-Robert Stöter < ***@***.***> wrote:
👋 @thejasvibr <https://github.com/thejasvibr> @svchb
<https://github.com/svchb> @ssfrr <https://github.com/ssfrr> @jfsantos
<https://github.com/jfsantos> @nantonel <https://github.com/nantonel> -
would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS
review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a
short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub
issues and follow these guidelines:
https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html
The software under review is a julia package
https://github.com/mei-friend/mei-friend
<https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/mei-friend>
This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once
sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue
where the review will take place.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5912 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC657MITUWTZYOH7B2XOE5LYQQVE3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA5OS4THSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJSG44DCNJUGM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
@svchb I linked the wrong submission. Sorry for that. Can you confirm that you could review https://github.com/1oly/AeroAcoustics.jl ? Thank you |
|
Can confirm i'd be happy to review the Aeroacoustics package
…On Sat, Jan 27, 2024, 11:25 AM Fabian-Robert Stöter < ***@***.***> wrote:
@svchb <https://github.com/svchb> I linked the wrong submission. Sorry
for that. Can you confirm that you could review
https://github.com/1oly/AeroAcoustics.jl ? Thank you
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5912 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC657MK5HVFNK6EKYF2P3X3YQTIZFAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5OS4THSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJTGEYDQMBYGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
happy to contribute to the review! |
|
Hi @faroit. Thanks for handling this 👍 I can confirm there's no conflict of interest.
|
yes i can |
|
👋 @jongwook @martinholters @gummif - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The JOSS review process takes place on GitHub and focuses on the software and a short paper. We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html The software under review is the following julia package https://github.com/1oly/AeroAcoustics.jl This issue is a "pre-review" issue in which reviewers are assigned. Once sufficient reviewers are recruited we will open a dedicated review issue where the review will take place. |
|
@1oly Just some explanation on the process: I took some time to go through the submitted package to better understand it. As I'm not an expert in Julia myself, I realized its best to have at least someone with a lot of experience in julia packaging. So I am picking |
|
@editorialbot add @nantonel as reviewer |
|
@nantonel added to the reviewers list! |
|
Thanks, will try to go through the package the soonest. Could you please let me know an approximate ETA for this? Thank you! |
|
@nantonel The review process will start in a separate issue when we have a second reviewer. I am going to assign one by next week. After that, the reviews are expected to be completed in about 2-4 weeks. Thanks a lot for helping JOSS! |
|
@editorialbot add @thejasvibr as reviewer |
|
@thejasvibr added to the reviewers list! |
|
@1oly after reading the paper myself, i feel confident that @thejasvibr would be a good pick as a second reviewer due to number of audio related techniques in AeroAcoustics. Happy that we can kick of the review phase now. |
|
@editorialbot start review |
|
OK, I've started the review over in #6390. |
Submitting author: @1oly (Oliver Lylloff)
Repository: https://github.com/1oly/AeroAcoustics.jl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v0.2.3
Editor: @faroit
Reviewers: @nantonel, @thejasvibr
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @1oly. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@1oly if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: