[PRE REVIEW]: OpenPelt: Python Framework for Thermoelectric Temperature Control System Development

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @gdetor (Georgios Detorakis)
Repository: https://github.com/thejackal360/OpenPelt-Public
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master
Version: alpha
Editor: @rkurchin
Reviewers: @tpurcell90, @danaraujocr
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c5d7515f1ddddab6eb8aa5c658b51c0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c5d7515f1ddddab6eb8aa5c658b51c0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c5d7515f1ddddab6eb8aa5c658b51c0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/3c5d7515f1ddddab6eb8aa5c658b51c0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @gdetor. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@gdetor if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8 is OK
- 10.1145/1731022.1731030 is OK
- 10.1109/IMTC.2000.848895 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.03.001 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00676-7 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- 10.1049/el20062442 is INVALID

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.26 s (85.2 files/s, 9066.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          17            275            311           1263
Markdown                         2             58              0            276
TeX                              1              7              0             81
Bourne Shell                     1              3              0             43
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            22            344            315           1681
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1206

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

Hi @gdetor and thanks for your submission. It is a bit borderline on size so I am going to ping the greater editorial board to take a look and make sure it is in scope for JOSS. This process will take 1-2 weeks, thanks.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@gdetor I have just removed the query-scope label since this work was deemed as potentially in scope for JOSS. We will now proceed to find a handling editor.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @rkurchin as editor

@rkurchin this may be somewhat out of your regular domain but do you think you can handle this submission?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot add me as editor

Sure!

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @rkurchin is now the editor

[rkurchin]

Hi @gdetor, nice to meet you! I'll work on finding some reviewers for this. In the meantime, whenever you get a moment, you can fix the DOI errors shown above...

[rkurchin]

👋 Hi @danaraujocr and @tpurcell90, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[thejackal360]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1049/el:20062442 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8 is OK
- 10.1145/1731022.1731030 is OK
- 10.1109/IMTC.2000.848895 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.03.001 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00676-7 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[thejackal360]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.03.001 is OK
- 10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00676-7 is OK
- 10.1049/el:20062442 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8 is OK
- 10.1145/1731022.1731030 is OK
- 10.1109/IMTC.2000.848895 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[tpurcell90]

@rkurchin I can be a reviewer for this

[danaraujocr]

Sure. I am available. I can be a reviewer. Le mer. 6 avr. 2022 à 17:34, Rachel Kurchin ***@***.***> a écrit :

…

👋 Hi @danaraujocr <https://github.com/danaraujocr> and @tpurcell90 <https://github.com/tpurcell90>, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4245 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEE42AWE6JCJ6BQ7IPBS5OTVDX7NVANCNFSM5Q43P6WQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot add @tpurcell90 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@tpurcell90 added to the reviewers list!

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot add @danaraujocr as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@danaraujocr added to the reviewers list!

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4306.