Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: Connectome Mapper 3: A Flexible and Open-Source Pipeline Software for Multiscale Multimodal Human Connectome Mapping #4194

Closed
editorialbot opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 45 comments

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Feb 23, 2022

Submitting author: @sebastientourbier (Sebastien Tourbier)
Repository: https://github.com/connectomicslab/connectomemapper3
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v3.0.3
Editor: @osorensen
Reviewers: @adbartni, @jsheunis
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/fa1f416a4a6c23fe19bda6f36f123c1e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sebastientourbier. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @arokem.

@sebastientourbier if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.58 s (107.1 files/s, 80766.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              3              0             25          65623
Python                          95           6525           9108          25397
TeX                              1            212              0           2392
reStructuredText                18           1331            409           2152
XML                              2              0              0           1854
YAML                             9             77            115           1720
Jupyter Notebook                 7              0           5607           1196
INI                             10             54              0            917
CSS                              1              0              9            723
Markdown                         3             81              0            493
HTML                             3             50              2            314
JSON                             6              0              0            228
Dockerfile                       1             43            111            192
DOS Batch                        1             23              1            166
make                             1             24              6            123
Bourne Shell                     7             15             40             66
JavaScript                       1              0              1              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           169           8435          15434         103557
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 2738

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3475969 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060 is OK
- 10.1101/188706 is OK
- 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.08.056 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2014.49 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00090 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4500 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2018.00052 is OK
- 10.1109/TMI.2008.922696 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00458 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0080713 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.1076 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3571874 is OK
- 10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2019.00001 is OK
- 10.1089/brain.2013.0154 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048 is OK
- 10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6736878 is OK
- 10.3389/978-2-88945-472-3 is OK
- 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2012.00149 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00042 is OK
- 10.3389/978-2-88945-821-9 is OK
- 10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-8176-8379-5_19 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0048121 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.008 is OK
- 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042 is OK
- 10.1101/631952 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2017.04.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.042 is OK
- 10.1101/188706 is OK
- 10.1038/s41562-016-0021 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.21333 is OK
- 10.1101/611590 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.073 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2014.49 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2012.06.005 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.064 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116678 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.065 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.24468 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3752 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.018 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00054 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-5611-1_30 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.084 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-072018-021237 is OK
- 10.1038/mp.2017.92 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.035 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.109 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nic.2019.03.005 is OK
- 10.1007/s10278-018-0089-4 is OK
- 10.1145/1272996.1273025 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.047 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2012.00009 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3785 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3734 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.004 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00111 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_e_00052 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2017.00656 is OK
- 10.1101/802629 is OK
- 10.1007/s10548-018-0691-2 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2017.00017 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.091 is OK
- 10.1109/TMI.2015.2430850 is OK
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-398398-5.00009-6 is OK
- 10.1186/s13742-015-0072-7 is OK
- 10.1007/s11682-018-9994-x is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-31208-3_6 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.09.015 is OK
- 10.1109/TMI.2006.880587 is OK
- 10.1073/PNAS.1922248117 is OK
- 10.1073/PNAS.1922248117 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.087 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.10268 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.034 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3841 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2018.270 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.1940080707 is OK
- 10.1109/MPUL.2011.2181023 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.046 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04614-w is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2012.00014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.031 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.016 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4134 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.055 is OK
- 10.1155/2018/5340717 is OK
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-398398-5.00008-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.014 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661 is OK
- 10.1002/ima.22005 is OK
- 10.1017/nws.2013.19 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.001 is OK
- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 is OK
- 10.1101/2020.10.15.341495 is OK
- 10.1101/443556 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2012.00022 is OK
- 10.1002/eap.1822 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006064 is OK
- 10.1038/nrn3475 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46720-7_24 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.186 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.20279 is OK
- 10.1101/2020.09.04.282269 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.012 is OK
- 10.1002/uog.5256 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2015.00012 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.23843 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2017.00076 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.002 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.016 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3712762 is OK
- 10.1038/nrn.2016.167 is OK
- 10.1093/gigascience/gix013 is OK
- 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5763 is OK
- 10.11138/FNeur/2017.32.2.097 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.092 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01294 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.056 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.22083 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00059 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1007/s11571-017-9445-1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0113838 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.018 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1801582115 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00044 is OK
- 10.3389/fpls.2011.00034 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000066 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0073-y is OK
- 10.1109/NER.2019.8717114 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.053 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.053 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4550 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.052 is OK
- 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.024 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2013.03.009 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2013.03.009 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.070 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116207 is OK
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00147 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00218 is OK
- doi10.18112/openneuro.ds003505.v1.0.3 is OK
- doi10.18112/openneuro.ds003505.v1.1.1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-021-01116-1 is OK
- 10.12688/f1000research.20887.3 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.01.31.478189 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00114 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-319-61358-1_9 may be a valid DOI for title: Diffusion MRI Anisotropy : Modeling , Analysis and Interpretation
- 10.1126/sciadv.aba8245 may be a valid DOI for title: A new method for accurate in vivo mapping of human brain connections using microstructural and anatomical information
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 may be a valid DOI for title: Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks

INVALID DOIs

- 10.1016/S1053-81190291132-8 is INVALID
- 10.1038/nn.4502.Network is INVALID
- 10.1162/netn is INVALID
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1101/551739 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- 10.1002/SICI1099-149219990212151AID-NBM5463.0.CO2-E is INVALID
- 10.1126/science.1213847.Reproducible is INVALID
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.09.006 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102336 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117137 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25365 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118611 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.008 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 23, 2022

@sebastientourbier, for authors with multiple affiliations, please quote them. e.g.:

  - name: Meritxell Bach Cuadra
    affiliation: "7,1"
    orcid: 0000-0003-2730-4285

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 24, 2022

@sebastientourbier – also while I'm looking for an editor for your submission, could you please update your BibTeX file? Specifically:

  • Please limit your BibTex file to only the entries that you're actually citing in your paper.
  • Where @editorialbot has suggestions, please check if the DOIs are correct and add them to your BibTeX file.

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

OK. I am going to take care of this very soon.
I will let you know when this is done.

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot commands

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello @sebastientourbier, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@editorialbot check references
@editorialbot check references from branch custom-branch-name

# Perform checks on the repository
# Optionally, it can be run on a non-default branch 
@editorialbot check repository
@editorialbot check repository from branch custom-branch-name

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3475969 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060 is OK
- 10.1101/188706 is OK
- 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.08.056 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2014.49 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00090 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4500 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2018.00052 is OK
- 10.1109/TMI.2008.922696 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00458 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0080713 is OK
- 10.1002/jmri.1076 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3571874 is OK
- 10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2019.00001 is OK
- 10.1089/brain.2013.0154 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048 is OK
- 10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6736878 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4502 is OK
- 10.3389/978-2-88945-472-3 is OK
- 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2012.00149 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00042 is OK
- 10.3389/978-2-88945-821-9 is OK
- 10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z is OK
- 10.1007/978-0-8176-8379-5_19 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0048121 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.008 is OK
- 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042 is OK
- 10.1101/631952 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2017.04.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.042 is OK
- 10.1101/188706 is OK
- 10.1038/s41562-016-0021 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.21333 is OK
- 10.1101/611590 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.073 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2014.49 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2012.06.005 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.064 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116678 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.065 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.24468 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3752 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.018 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00054 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-5611-1_30 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.003 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.084 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00098 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-072018-021237 is OK
- 10.1038/mp.2017.92 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.035 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.109 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nic.2019.03.005 is OK
- 10.1007/s10278-018-0089-4 is OK
- 10.1145/1272996.1273025 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.047 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2012.00009 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3785 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3734 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.004 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00111 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_e_00052 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2017.00656 is OK
- 10.1101/802629 is OK
- 10.1007/s10548-018-0691-2 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2017.00017 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.091 is OK
- 10.1109/TMI.2015.2430850 is OK
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-398398-5.00009-6 is OK
- 10.1186/s13742-015-0072-7 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 is OK
- 10.1007/s11682-018-9994-x is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-31208-3_6 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.09.015 is OK
- 10.1109/TMI.2006.880587 is OK
- 10.1073/PNAS.1922248117 is OK
- 10.1073/PNAS.1922248117 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.087 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.10268 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.018 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.034 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.3841 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2018.270 is OK
- 10.1002/nbm.1940080707 is OK
- 10.1109/MPUL.2011.2181023 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.046 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04614-w is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2012.00014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.031 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.016 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4134 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.055 is OK
- 10.1155/2018/5340717 is OK
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-398398-5.00008-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.014 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661 is OK
- 10.1101/551739 is OK
- 10.1002/ima.22005 is OK
- 10.1017/nws.2013.19 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.001 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.001 is OK
- 10.1038/nbt.3820 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 is OK
- 10.1101/2020.10.15.341495 is OK
- 10.1101/443556 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2012.00022 is OK
- 10.1002/eap.1822 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006064 is OK
- 10.1038/nrn3475 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46720-7_24 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.186 is OK
- 10.1002/mrm.20279 is OK
- 10.1101/2020.09.04.282269 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.012 is OK
- 10.1002/uog.5256 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2015.00012 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.23843 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2017.00076 is OK
- 10.1126/science.1213847 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.002 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.016 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3712762 is OK
- 10.1038/nrn.2016.167 is OK
- 10.1093/gigascience/gix013 is OK
- 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5763 is OK
- 10.11138/FNeur/2017.32.2.097 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.092 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01294 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.056 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.22083 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 is OK
- 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00059 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1007/s11571-017-9445-1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0113838 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.018 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 is OK
- 10.1073/pnas.1801582115 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00044 is OK
- 10.3389/fpls.2011.00034 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.09.006 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000066 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-019-0073-y is OK
- 10.1109/NER.2019.8717114 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.053 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.053 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4550 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.052 is OK
- 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.024 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2013.03.009 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2013.03.009 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.070 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116207 is OK
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102336 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117137 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00147 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25365 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118611 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00218 is OK
- doi10.18112/openneuro.ds003505.v1.0.3 is OK
- doi10.18112/openneuro.ds003505.v1.1.1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-021-01116-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 is OK
- 10.12688/f1000research.20887.3 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.01.31.478189 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00114 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-319-61358-1_9 may be a valid DOI for title: Diffusion MRI Anisotropy : Modeling , Analysis and Interpretation
- 10.1126/sciadv.aba8245 may be a valid DOI for title: A new method for accurate in vivo mapping of human brain connections using microstructural and anatomical information
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 may be a valid DOI for title: Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks

INVALID DOIs

- 10.1016/S1053-811928022991132-8 is INVALID
- 10.1002/28SICI291099-14922819990229123A13C513A3AAID-NBM5463E3.0.CO3B2-E is INVALID

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3475969 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.08.056 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4500 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3571874 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2019.00001 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4502 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0048121 is OK
- 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.042 is OK
- 10.1101/188706 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.065 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-072018-021237 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_e_00052 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-31208-3_6 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.09.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.018 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2018.270 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.031 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01185-5 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3712762 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01294 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.09.006 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4550 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102336 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117137 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00147 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25365 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118611 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00218 is OK
- doi10.18112/openneuro.ds003505.v1.1.1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-021-01116-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 is OK
- 10.12688/f1000research.20887.3 is OK
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.01.31.478189 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00114 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:

Lexical or syntactical errors: 

@@

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3475969 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.08.056 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4500 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3571874 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2019.00001 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4502 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0048121 is OK
- 10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.042 is OK
- 10.1101/188706 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.065 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005209 is OK
- 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-072018-021237 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2014.00008 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_e_00052 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-642-31208-3_6 is OK
- 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.09.015 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.018 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2018.270 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.031 is OK
- 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 is OK
- 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01185-5 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3712762 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01294 is OK
- 10.1038/sdata.2016.44 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.09.006 is OK
- 10.1038/nn.4550 is OK
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102336 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117137 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00147 is OK
- 10.1002/hbm.25365 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118611 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00218 is OK
- doi10.18112/openneuro.ds003505.v1.1.1 is OK
- 10.1038/s41597-021-01116-1 is OK
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.008 is OK
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 is OK
- 10.12688/f1000research.20887.3 is OK
- 10.1101/gr.1239303 is OK
- 10.1101/2022.01.31.478189 is OK
- 10.1162/netn_a_00114 is OK
- 10.1073/PNAS.1922248117 is OK
- 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@sebastientourbier
Copy link

@arfon I reviewed my BibTex file and only kept the entries that are used in the paper. I also took care of adding a few missing DOI and correcting a few problematic ones. Now it seems everything is fine with check references and by checking the generated PDF.

@arfon arfon added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Feb 27, 2022
@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 27, 2022

Thanks @sebastientourbier. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editors most appropriate for your area are already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Copy link
Member

@osorensen is this something you think you could help edit? It is waitlisted at the moment but seems related to your field too.

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot assign @osorensen as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @osorensen is now the editor

@osorensen osorensen removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Mar 9, 2022
@osorensen
Copy link
Member

👋 @jwirsich @adbartni @jameschapman19 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@jwirsich
Copy link

@osorensen Thanks fo the invite but I'm coauthor on the paper ;)

@adbartni
Copy link

@osorensen Thanks for reaching out, I'd be glad to review!

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@osorensen Thanks fo the invite but I'm coauthor on the paper ;)

Oooops.. Sorry!

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot add @adbartni as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@adbartni added to the reviewers list!

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@szorowi1 @jsheunis would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@jsheunis
Copy link

@osorensen I'd be happy to help. One question, what's the expected timeline for finishing a review? I just started working again after parental leave, so I have a backlog of tasks to get done first.

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

Thanks @jsheunis. There's no strict timeline, but if you can complete the first round of review within a month it would be great. Does that sound ok?

@jsheunis
Copy link

That will work 👍

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot add @jsheunis as reviewer

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jsheunis added to the reviewers list!

@osorensen
Copy link
Member

@editorialbot start review

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK, I've started the review over in #4248.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants