[PRE REVIEW]: Sepia, a taxonomy oriented read classifier in Rust

[whedon]

Submitting author: @hcdenbakker (Henk den Bakker)
Repository: https://github.com/hcdenbakker/sepia
Version: v0.0.2
Editor: @will-rowe
Reviewers: @Ebedthan, @telatin
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/711e7a5f1810c1211a515ea0c0beab9f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/711e7a5f1810c1211a515ea0c0beab9f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/711e7a5f1810c1211a515ea0c0beab9f/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/711e7a5f1810c1211a515ea0c0beab9f)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @hcdenbakker. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@hcdenbakker if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #3825 with the following error:

 Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.10 s (218.4 files/s, 73348.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rust                            17            239            674           6030
Markdown                         1             36              0            137
Python                           1              8             12            108
Bourne Shell                     1              7             15             81
TOML                             1              4              1             33
YAML                             1              0              0              5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            22            294            702           6394
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository 'c1b3abb1b25cb79f7d6a0869' was
gathered on 2021/10/14.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Henk den Bakker                  1           128              0          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Henk den Bakker             128          100.0          0.0                5.47

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[arfon]

@whedon invite @will-rowe as editor

👋 @will-rowe - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[whedon]

@will-rowe has been invited to edit this submission.

[hcdenbakker]

I would like to suggest andrewjpage and luizirber as reviewers

[will-rowe]

Hi there. Sorry for the delay. This sounds great.

[will-rowe]

@whedon assign @will-rowe as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @will-rowe

[will-rowe]

Hi @luizirber and @andrewjpage - are you both able to review this for JOSS please?

[luizirber]

I pinged @Ebedthan and he is interested in reviewing.

And please ping me again in two weeks if there are missing reviewers =)

[will-rowe]

Thanks Luiz. Hi @Ebedthan - it would be great if you could review?

[Ebedthan]

Yes, count me in @will-rowe.

[will-rowe]

Great - thanks @Ebedthan. I'll assign you whilst we find another reviewer, then we can start the review process. I'll keep you posted here!

[will-rowe]

@whedon assign @Ebedthan as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @Ebedthan is now a reviewer

[will-rowe]

@lskatz - would you be willing to review this?

[hcdenbakker]

Hi @will-rowe, @lskatz is my co-author on this paper

[will-rowe]

Oops, sorry. Long day!

[hcdenbakker]

Maybe bovee and audy are potential additional reviewers

[andrewjpage]

Hi @will-rowe sorry I've a conflict of interest on this one. I'll see if any alternatives are available.

[telatin]

I'll see if any alternatives are available.

Hello everyone, I'm happy to review this if needed!

[will-rowe]

No problem @andrewjpage

[will-rowe]

Hi @telatin - thank you very much and yes please!

[will-rowe]

@whdeon add @telatin as reviewer

[will-rowe]

@whedon add @telatin as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @telatin is now a reviewer

[will-rowe]

Thanks @telatin and @Ebedthan - we'll kick of the review thread now. Please let me know if you need any extra information (I see you have both done JOSS reviews before)

[will-rowe]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3839.