-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Functionality: Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed? #3563
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Downloading of the repository (to check the bibtex) failed for issue #3563 failed with the following error:
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #3563 with the following error:
|
Downloading of the repository (to analyze the language) for issue #3563 failed with the following error:
|
Please manually open an issue in the software source code's repository - the github "feauture" you used doesn't work correctly - it opens the issue in the wrong repo, and doesn't tell the submitter what the exact problem and potential solution are. |
I had good success testing several functions (h_vb_stan, h_gompertz_stan, and catch_curve) with my data and with public data sets (BlackDrum2001 and Brook Trout). The Gompertz model was spot on to my previous estimates.
When testing h_vb_stan, the estimate for L infinity was 5000 mm more than it should have been, when I requested t0 = TRUE. The estimates were fine for t0 = FALSE. This occurred with one data set (mine), but was fine with BlackDrum2001 (from Ogle). My data are biased toward very young fish (age 1-2), with few fish over age 4, which might be the problem. However, I have been able to achieve reasonable estimates in R and SAS. These data are in press, but I attached for the authors to check. Please consider them not open data at the moment. It might have been me or it might have been the data, but then again, it might have been the package. I attempted to attach, hope it worked.
MG.xlsx
#good estimate with t0=FALSE
growth_coef[1,1] 412.9389142 3.015959709 12.27809496 412.5017118 16.57337 1.119560
growth_coef[1,2] 416.1777699 3.479534558 12.83390134 418.3515820 13.60427 1.149403
growth_coef[2,1] 0.5350705 0.004839283 0.02816545 0.5380143 33.87438 1.082948
growth_coef[2,2] 0.5284937 0.011779580 0.04672065 0.5215366 15.73107 1.127339
#poor estimate with t-=TRUE
Warning messages:
1: There were 90 divergent transitions after warmup. See
http://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#divergent-transitions-after-warmup
to find out why this is a problem and how to eliminate them.
2: There were 87 transitions after warmup that exceeded the maximum treedepth. Increase max_treedepth above 10. See
http://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#maximum-treedepth-exceeded
3: There were 1 chains where the estimated Bayesian Fraction of Missing Information was low. See
http://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#bfmi-low
4: Examine the pairs() plot to diagnose sampling problems
5: The largest R-hat is NA, indicating chains have not mixed.
Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
http://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#r-hat
6: Bulk Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low, indicating posterior means and medians may be unreliable.
Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
http://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#bulk-ess
7: Tail Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low, indicating posterior variances and tail quantiles may be unreliable.
Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
http://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#tail-ess
growth_coef[1,1] 5401.598901 6281.2936447 8943.229314 364.954084 2.027172 25.783682
growth_coef[1,2] 314.949252 144.7459496 205.940111 344.254750 2.024273 23.937948
growth_coef[2,1] 4.233159 3.6421330 5.183172 1.697671 2.025254 30.495047
growth_coef[2,2] 1.512192 0.9655945 1.397608 1.304163 2.094987 12.136972
growth_coef[3,1] -5.815315 2.7314191 3.883504 -6.567190 2.021486 43.233233
growth_coef[3,2] -6.505797 2.6907258 3.847480 -8.504928 2.044625 9.551402
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: