[PRE REVIEW]: academictwitteR: an R Package to Access the Twitter Academic Research Product Track V2 API Endpoint

[whedon]

Submitting author: @cjbarrie (Christopher Barrie)
Repository: https://github.com/cjbarrie/academictwitteR
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @medewitt, @JosiahParry
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cjbarrie. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cjbarrie if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.2528481 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4714637 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.13 s (263.6 files/s, 23775.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               24            136            648           1340
Markdown                         6            112              0            275
Rmd                              3            171            213            152
TeX                              1              2              0             17
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            34            421            861           1784
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '5e460013e4936d4752f26310' was
gathered on 2021/05/10.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

[danielskatz]

👋 @cjbarrie - Thanks for your submission. I'll be the editor.

Do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers? Please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). This list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list) or you may know of others who would be good reviewers.

[cjbarrie]

Hey! Thanks so much for the quick response. Any of @JosiahParry, @medewitt, @zhanglipku or @natematias?

[danielskatz]

without tagging them with an @ ...

[danielskatz]

👋 @JosiahParry, @medewitt, @zhanglipku, @natematias - Would a couple of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[JosiahParry]

Hi @danielskatz I'd love to. What is the timeline we're looking at for this?

[danielskatz]

We try for a couple of weeks, but a bit longer is ok. Reviews are somewhat iterative as well, so if there are any issues you find, it's great for you to point them out then rather than waiting to have a complete review. Is this ok? If so, I will add you as a reviewer, but the review won't start until I get another reviewer as well, and open a new issue for the review itself.

[medewitt]

Happy to review as well.

…

On Mon, May 10, 2021, 5:06 PM Daniel S. Katz ***@***.***> wrote: We try for a couple of weeks, but a bit longer is ok. Reviews are somewhat iterative as well, so if there are any issues you find, it's great for you to point them out then rather than waiting to have a complete review. Is this ok? If so, I will add you as a reviewer, but the review won't start until I get another reviewer as well, and open a new issue for the review itself. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3271 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7A75KGTQTSJLZJ2OWUQTTTNBDE5ANCNFSM44RT544Q> .

[danielskatz]

Thanks @medewitt - I'll add you, and if @JosiahParry is ok with the schedule, we'll start the review.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @medewitt as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @medewitt is now a reviewer

[JosiahParry]

A few weeks is okay for me! :)

[danielskatz]

great, thanks! - I'll start the review and send you another note over there

[danielskatz]

@whedon add @JosiahParry as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @JosiahParry is now a reviewer

[danielskatz]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3272.

[zhanglipku]

sorry for responding late, but would be happy to review if needed!

[danielskatz]

@zhanglipku - thanks for offering, but the review has started with other reviewers, so no need at this point...