-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: statsExpressions: R Package for Tidy Dataframes and Expressions with Statistical Details #3111
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Failed to discover a |
|
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #3111 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-92346a0773a4/lib/whedon/author.rb:72:in |
@IndrajeetPatil - this PR should fix your paper compilation IndrajeetPatil/statsExpressions#81 |
@karthik has been invited to edit this submission. |
Potential reviewers:
Will suggest a few more if none of them can review the submission. |
@arfon Currently don't have bandwidth to edit this but let me know if you can't find anyone else to take over. |
@arfon Are we allowed to make suggestions about possible editors as well? If yes, I can suggest the following people: Will suggest a few more if none of them can edit the submission. |
@whedon generate pdf |
Hi everyone, any update on the submission? I have suggested both possible editors and reviewers. |
@IndrajeetPatil - apologies for the slow progress here. As our existing editors are a little overloaded I'm going to mark this submission as |
Can this submission be reconsidered for review? Two of my other submissions (both |
Not necessarily so. Please be patient. |
@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission. |
@whedon assign me as editor |
OK, the editor is @mikldk |
@IndrajeetPatil Thanks for your submission. Can you briefly describe how this package differs e.g. from |
So
broom::tidy(t.test(mtcars$wt, mu = 3))
#> # A tibble: 1 x 8
#> estimate statistic p.value parameter conf.low conf.high method alternative
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 3.22 1.26 0.218 31 2.86 3.57 One Sampl… two.sided
(df <- statsExpressions::one_sample_test(mtcars, wt, test.value = 3))
#> # A tibble: 1 x 11
#> mu statistic df.error p.value method estimate conf.level conf.low conf.high
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 3 1.26 31 0.218 One S… 0.217 0.95 -0.129 0.566
#> # … with 2 more variables: effectsize <chr>, expression <list> Additionally, library(ggplot2)
ggplot(mtcars, aes(wt)) + geom_histogram() +
labs(subtitle = df$expression[[1]])
#> `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`. Created on 2021-04-23 by the reprex package (v2.0.0) |
Oh, forgot to say, thanks for accepting to edit this submission :) |
@RMHogervorst, @martinju: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. |
I think you meant @RMHogervorst? |
Indeed. |
@mikldk Thanks for the suggestion, but I don't have time for at least a couple of weeks. |
@Prof-ThiagoOliveira: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. |
@mikldk Here are a few other reviewer suggestions:
|
Dear Mikkel,
I am afraid I have to reject review this paper because I don't have enough time to review it accordingly this and next month. I am happy to receive more invitations in a couple of months.
best regards,
Thiago
…________________________________
From: Mikkel Meyer Andersen ***@***.***>
Sent: 26 April 2021 08:44
To: openjournals/joss-reviews ***@***.***>
Cc: DE PAULA OLIVEIRA Thiago ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: statsExpressions: R Package for Tidy Dataframes and Expressions with Statistical Details (#3111)
This email was sent to you by someone outside the University.
You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe.
@Prof-ThiagoOliveira<https://github.com/Prof-ThiagoOliveira>: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software<https://joss.theoj.org/>? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#3111 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIGNHDIDULEDG5PTJPTAYUTTKUKWHANCNFSM4ZFKBRNQ>.
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th’ ann an Oilthigh Dhùn Èideann, clàraichte an Alba, àireamh clàraidh SC005336.
|
@ohmaddi: Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. |
@mikldk Maybe we can invite a few others and check their availability? Let me know if I should suggest more reviewers. |
@mariacuellar @russellpierce @tomfaulkenberry @cimentadaj @humanfactors Would you be interested in reviewing this submission to The Journal of Open Source Software? Reviews are open and based on a checklist. The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. If you have any questions or concerns please let me know. |
Happy to accept this review. Thanks for the information. |
@whedon add @humanfactors as reviewer |
OK, @humanfactors is now a reviewer |
Thanks, @humanfactors . (We still need one more.) |
@mikldk I would like to flag a potential perceived conflict of interest (i.e., to "avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest" as per JOSS policy). Both @IndrajeetPatil and I are members of the easystats contributor list and we both were CRAN co-authors on the If this is perceived as a possible COI, I would request this COI is waived on the basis that:
I place this here to be as thorough as possible and ensure I conform to policies. |
@humanfactors Thanks for flagging this. I agree that this is not a COI based on the description above. |
@mikldk I'll be happy to review this. Thanks! |
@whedon add @tomfaulkenberry as reviewer |
OK, @tomfaulkenberry is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #3236. |
Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil (Indrajeet Patil)
Repository: https://github.com/IndrajeetPatil/statsExpressions
Version: 1.0.0
Editor: @mikldk
Reviewers: @humanfactors, @tomfaulkenberry
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @IndrajeetPatil. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@IndrajeetPatil if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: