Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: FielDHub: An R Shiny Package for Design of Experiments in Life Sciences #3107

Closed
whedon opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 26 comments

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

Submitting author: @DidierMurilloF (Didier Murillo Florez)
Repository: https://github.com/DidierMurilloF/FielDHub
Version: 0.1.0
Editor: @csoneson
Reviewers: @Prof-ThiagoOliveira, @dlebauer
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DidierMurilloF. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@DidierMurilloF if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.31 s (423.4 files/s, 88849.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            30           1365            357          10651
R                               81           1779           1824           9880
CSS                              5            148             70            642
JavaScript                       3             64             32            256
Markdown                         5             71              0            181
TeX                              1              5              0             52
YAML                             4              4              3             43
SVG                              1              0              1             11
Rmd                              1             12             31              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           131           3448           2318          21722
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '94bad9ed849a59e518e6d04d' was
gathered on 2021/03/14.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
DidierMurillo                    1           352              0          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
DidierMurillo               352          100.0          0.0                9.09

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1198/108571106X154443 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2011.00642.x is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Mar 14, 2021

@whedon invite @csoneson as editor

👋 @csoneson - would you be able to edit this submission for JOSS?

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 14, 2021

@csoneson has been invited to edit this submission.

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

@whedon assign @csoneson as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 16, 2021

OK, the editor is @csoneson

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

👋 @DidierMurilloF - thanks for submitting to JOSS. I will handle your submission, and start by finding a couple of suitable reviewers. If you have any suggestions (e.g., from the list linked in the first post above), please mention them here (without tagging them with @).

I noticed that your paper is currently missing a 'Statement of Need' section (see here). Could you please add that (I think you can break out a part of the 'Summary' section)? Also, please fix the invalid DOI mentioned by Whedon above (remove the https://doi.org/ prefix). Thanks!

@DidierMurilloF
Copy link

DidierMurilloF commented Mar 16, 2021 via email

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 17, 2021

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

@whedon check references

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 17, 2021

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2011.00642.x is OK
- 10.1198/108571106X154443 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

👋 @Prof-ThiagoOliveira, @dlebauer - would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

FielDHub: An R Shiny Package for Design of Experiments in Life Sciences

@Prof-ThiagoOliveira
Copy link

Prof-ThiagoOliveira commented Mar 17, 2021 via email

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

@Prof-ThiagoOliveira - great, thanks! Once we have secured one more reviewer I will start the actual review issue (where you will find the checklist to fill etc).

@dlebauer
Copy link

dlebauer commented Mar 18, 2021 via email

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

Brilliant, thanks both for your quick replies! I will now open the review issue and further communication will happen over there.

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

@whedon assign @Prof-ThiagoOliveira as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 18, 2021

OK, @Prof-ThiagoOliveira is now a reviewer

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

@whedon add @dlebauer as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 18, 2021

OK, @dlebauer is now a reviewer

@csoneson
Copy link
Member

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Mar 18, 2021

OK, I've started the review over in #3122.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants