[PRE REVIEW]: Autosubmit GUI: A Javascript-based Graphical User Interface to Monitor Experiments Workflow Execution

[whedon]

Submitting author: @wuruchi (Wilmer Uruchi Ticona)
Repository: https://earth.bsc.es/gitlab/wuruchi/autosubmitreact
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @djmitche
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wuruchi. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@wuruchi if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/HPCSim.2016.7568429 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-10-19-2017 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

@whedon check repository

[danielskatz]

👋 @openjournals/dev - any thoughts on why 👆 doesn't work?

[danielskatz]

👋 @wuruchi - I'm unsure if this fits JOSS, so the editors will now discuss if it meets JOSS's scope for review, specifically to make sure that we consider it research software (and also possible to check the size/scholarly effort of the software). This normally would take about a week, but might take longer due to the holidays.

[danielskatz]

@whedon query scope

[whedon]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=199.57 s (130.4 files/s, 17373.8 lines/s)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                             files          blank        comment           code
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                           18443         332909         352433        1848572
JSON                                  2832            296              0         369561
Markdown                              2179          88917              4         220358
HTML                                   312          18648            405          64383
TypeScript                            1768           8268          44195          53475
CSS                                    104           1297           2642          20501
C/C++ Header                            42           1342            431           7073
C++                                     22           1292           1096           5645
D                                       20              0              0           5567
YAML                                   213            244            176           4207
XML                                      3            233             11           2011
CoffeeScript                            28            611             54           1649
LESS                                    13            272            745           1630
make                                    20            277            384            988
Bourne Shell                             8            194            132            936
Python                                   4             83            177            798
SVG                                      8             14              5            681
diff                                     1              3             13            588
Windows Module Definition                5             83              0            451
PHP                                      1             33             52             70
JSON5                                    1              0              0             55
TeX                                      1              7              0             46
Bourne Again Shell                       2             11              1             43
TOML                                     1              2              0             39
EJS                                      1              0              0              9
Lisp                                     1              0              0              6
DOS Batch                                1              0              0              2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                                 26034         455036         402956        2609344
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '662038724d77940241bd1d35' was
gathered on 2020/12/22.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Wilmer Uruchi Ticona            59       2258199         102129           61.43
bleudchanel                     68       1098792         375195           38.36
wuruchi                         14          6658           1550            0.21

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
bleudchanel             1084604           98.7          2.1               11.96
wuruchi                 1965759        29524.8          1.8               16.13

[danielskatz]

@openjournals/dev - never mind my request above - check repository just took a really long time...

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=391.01 s (66.6 files/s, 8867.6 lines/s)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                             files          blank        comment           code
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                           18443         332909         353806        1847199
JSON                                  2832            296              0         369561
Markdown                              2179          88917              4         220358
HTML                                   312          18648            405          64383
TypeScript                            1768           8268          44195          53475
CSS                                    104           1297           2642          20501
C/C++ Header                            42           1342            431           7073
C++                                     22           1292           1096           5645
D                                       20              0              0           5567
YAML                                   213            244            176           4207
XML                                      3            233             11           2011
CoffeeScript                            28            611             54           1649
LESS                                    13            272            745           1630
make                                    20            277            384            988
Bourne Shell                             8            194            132            936
Python                                   4             83            177            798
SVG                                      8             14              5            681
diff                                     1              3             13            588
Windows Module Definition                5             83              0            451
PHP                                      1             33             52             70
JSON5                                    1              0              0             55
TeX                                      1              7              0             46
Bourne Again Shell                       2             11              1             43
TOML                                     1              2              0             39
EJS                                      1              0              0              9
Lisp                                     1              0              0              6
DOS Batch                                1              0              0              2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                                 26034         455036         404329        2607971
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository 'ab1e9a7db33ea546df362da7' was
gathered on 2020/12/22.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Wilmer Uruchi Ticona            59       2258199         102129           61.43
bleudchanel                     68       1098792         375195           38.36
wuruchi                         14          6658           1550            0.21

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
bleudchanel             1084604           98.7          2.1               11.96
wuruchi                 1965759        29524.8          1.8               16.13

[wuruchi]

👋 @wuruchi - I'm unsure if this fits JOSS, so the editors will now discuss if it meets JOSS's scope for review, specifically to make sure that we consider it research software (and also possible to check the size/scholarly effort of the software). This normally would take about a week, but might take longer due to the holidays.

Hello @danielskatz. We will be waiting for the editors' answer and we are open to any request.

As a side note, the users bleudchanel and wuruchi are both my users. Author bleudchanel was introduced when I switched to working from home and forgot to update my git user. Wilmer Uruchi Ticona is just me.

Thank you for your time.

[arfon]

@openjournals/dev - never mind my request above - check repository just took a really long time...

Yeah, I think this is because clones from that server are really slooooooooow.

[wuruchi]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[wuruchi]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

[wuruchi]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

Hi @wuruchi! The editorial board has decided that this submission is in scope, so we can proceed. Next step is to find a handling editor for your submission.

[kthyng]

@lorenanicole I know I pinged you on another submission to edit recently, but also wondering if you can take this one on.

[kthyng]

@whedon invite @lorenanicole as editor

[whedon]

@lorenanicole has been invited to edit this submission.

[wuruchi]

Hello @kthyng

Hi @wuruchi! The editorial board has decided that this submission is in scope, so we can proceed. Next step is to find a handling editor for your submission.

Hello @kthyng. That is great news!

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @lorenanicole, just pinging you again on this edit request. Thanks!

[arfon]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @arfon

[arfon]

👋 @wuruchi - apologies it has taken so long to assign an editor here. Many of our JOSS editors are extremely busy right now.

Could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission?

[wuruchi]

Hello @arfon

No worries.

I think any of these reviewers could be a good choice:

• @desilinguist
• @pragyansmita
• @djmitche
• @Fil
• @pgadige
• @aokad
• @vc1492a

[arfon]

👋 @ygrange @daissi @wjakethompson @vijaysm - would any of your be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

The submission under review is Autosubmit GUI: A Javascript-based Graphical User Interface to Monitor Experiments Workflow Execution.

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

[wjakethompson]

I have no Javascript experience, so I'm not sure that I'd be a good fit for this one given that I have no idea what I'd be looking for 😄.

[desilinguist]

Same here. I can't really review JS code.

[daissi]

Sorry, I don't have free time currently and no experience with Javascript.

[ygrange]

Same point on JS code as the others. I can, and am totally happy to, look at it functionality-wise and look at things like testing etc.

[djmitche]

Not to throw myself under a bus that others seem to be successfully avoiding, but .. I know a bit of React and a lot of JS and can take a look.

[vijaysm]

Unfortunately I don't have enough experience with JavaScript and can't do justice to review the submission. But the tool description does sound interesting and can offer some comments if I get the time to play with it. Best.

…

On Thu., Feb. 18, 2021, 13:59 Dustin J. Mitchell, ***@***.***> wrote: Not to throw myself under a bus that others seem to be successfully avoiding, but .. I know a bit of React and a lot of JS and can take a look. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2924 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACVEPIVATSL7H2EV6JAQGLS7VPRVANCNFSM4VGE7WGA> .

[arfon]

@djmitche - thanks so much! I'll go ahead and assign you now and start the review ✨

[whedon]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

[arfon]

@whedon add @djmitche as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @djmitche is now a reviewer

[arfon]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3049.

[arfon]

@RuneBlaze @ikayz - would either of your be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

The submission under review is Autosubmit GUI: A Javascript-based Graphical User Interface to Monitor Experiments Workflow Execution.

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

[ikayz]

@arfon The issue has been closed does it still need a review?

[arfon]

@ikayz - we're still looking for a second reviewer if you're able to help out!

[ikayz]

@arfon sure thing though I don't think I'm part of the repo.

[arfon]

Ah OK. I've added you to the review over in #3049. Thanks again @ikayz!