Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support generation of LaTeX files without JOSS styling #16

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

tarleb
Copy link
Collaborator

@tarleb tarleb commented Aug 30, 2022

A new output format arxiv is added, which will generate a LaTeX file
paper.arxiv that has no JOSS logos and no metadata sidebar. However,
the general styling is retained.

A new output format `arxiv` is added, which will generate a LaTeX file
`paper.arxiv` that has no JOSS logos and no metadata sidebar.  However,
the general styling is retained.
@tarleb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tarleb commented Aug 30, 2022

After reading the arXiv submission guidelines, I conclude that the following problems should be fixed:

  • It must be possible to process the resulting file with pdflatex; we currently use lualatex, and the template is tuned for that.
  • Optional: generate a .bib file that contains all references used in the paper, but only those. It seems that this file is not used, by arxiv, and we're using citeproc instead of bibtex, but it could be helpful.

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Sep 3, 2022

It must be possible to process the resulting file with pdflatex; we currently use lualatex, and the template is tuned for that.

Does that mean this approach is fundamentally flawed or just that there is some more work to do?

@tarleb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tarleb commented Sep 3, 2022

Ah sorry, I forgot to close this. The PR has been superseded by the recent "preprint" format changes: The LaTeX generated there is very close to pandoc's default template, so it doesn't have these issues.

@tarleb tarleb closed this Sep 3, 2022
@musoke musoke mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants