Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Adjust to core-changes (UoM) #14389

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from
Closed

[WIP] Adjust to core-changes (UoM) #14389

wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

J-N-K
Copy link
Member

@J-N-K J-N-K commented Feb 12, 2023

Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
(both originally invalid)

Signed-off-by: Jan N. Klug <[email protected]>
@J-N-K J-N-K added (potentially) not backward compatible work in progress A PR that is not yet ready to be merged awaiting other PR Depends on another PR labels Feb 12, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Hilbrand Hilbrand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The units for a number of channels of the dsmr binding are not correct. Specifically all volume are not liters. But also not all energy channels have the correct unit. I have no time at the moment to give detailed feedback.

@J-N-K
Copy link
Member Author

J-N-K commented Feb 12, 2023

The units for a number of channels of the dsmr binding are not correct. Specifically all volume are not liters. But also not all energy channels have the correct unit. I have no time at the moment to give detailed feedback.

The unit in a channel definition is used as a replacement for the dimension and will be used only in UI to suggest a unit when creating a new item for a link. It has no technical functionality, so no harm will be done. If the user accepts the suggested item, it behaves like before when no state description was set with a unit that differs from the system default unit.

@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
</channel-type>

<channel-type id="signalQuality">
<item-type>Number:Dimensionless</item-type>
<item-type unit="%">Number</item-type>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't all the README files be updated to match?
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting other PR Depends on another PR (potentially) not backward compatible work in progress A PR that is not yet ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants