Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cherry-pick(upgarde): scale down jiva contoller deployment only if not upgraded (#1663) #1665

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2020

Conversation

shubham14bajpai
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: shubham [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR cherry-picks PR #1663 to v1.9.x branch.

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • Fixes #
  • Labelled this PR & related issue with documentation tag
  • PR messages has document related information
  • Labelled this PR & related issue with breaking-changes tag
  • PR messages has breaking changes related information
  • Labelled this PR & related issue with requires-upgrade tag
  • PR messages has upgrade related information
  • Commit has unit tests
  • Commit has integration tests

…ed (openebs-archive#1663)

scale down jiva deployment only if not upgraded.

avoid scaling down the controller or replica deployment because of an accidental run of upgrade on already upgraded jiva volume. 

Signed-off-by: shubham <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@vishnuitta vishnuitta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes are good

@vishnuitta vishnuitta merged commit 65a08bb into openebs-archive:v1.9.x Apr 10, 2020
@shubham14bajpai shubham14bajpai deleted the jiva-cherry branch October 12, 2020 05:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants