ROCm build for UBI #144
Merged
ROCm build for UBI #144
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Xaenalt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Xaenalt
force-pushed
the
v0.5.5-rocm-ubi
branch
from
1fcbf28
to
8691a45
Compare
Xaenalt
force-pushed
the
v0.5.5-rocm-ubi
branch
from
8691a45
to
069bbbf
Compare
|
/retest-required |
|
@Xaenalt: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Is this a duplicate of #142? |
|
I am merging it because it build process become cyclic with openshift/release#56346. Rehearse-ask job of Openshift-CI changes for rcom build expecting Dockerfile.rocm.ubi be a part of code base where as this PR expecting openshift-ci is properly setup. |
|
@vaibhavjainwiz #142 is still open. Also, why were the build definitions merged before this Dockerfile was merged? |
Xaenalt
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2024
FILL IN THE PR DESCRIPTION HERE
FIX #xxxx (*link existing issues this PR will resolve*)
**BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE
DESCRIPTION ABOVE**
---
<details>
<!-- inside this <details> section, markdown rendering does not work, so
we use raw html here. -->
<summary><b> PR Checklist (Click to Expand) </b></summary>
<p>Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull
request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps
vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review
process.</p>
<h3>PR Title and Classification</h3>
<p>Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed
appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the
following:</p>
<ul>
<li><code>[Bugfix]</code> for bug fixes.</li>
<li><code>[CI/Build]</code> for build or continuous integration
improvements.</li>
<li><code>[Doc]</code> for documentation fixes and improvements.</li>
<li><code>[Model]</code> for adding a new model or improving an existing
model. Model name should appear in the title.</li>
<li><code>[Frontend]</code> For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g.,
OpenAI API server, <code>LLM</code> class, etc.) </li>
<li><code>[Kernel]</code> for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other
compute kernels.</li>
<li><code>[Core]</code> for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,
<code>LLMEngine</code>, <code>AsyncLLMEngine</code>,
<code>Scheduler</code>, etc.)</li>
<li><code>[Hardware][Vendor]</code> for hardware-specific changes.
Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,
<code>[Hardware][AMD]</code>).</li>
<li><code>[Misc]</code> for PRs that do not fit the above categories.
Please use this sparingly.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> If the PR spans more than one category, please
include all relevant prefixes.</p>
<h3>Code Quality</h3>
<p>The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:</p>
<ul>
<li>We adhere to <a
href="https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html">Google Python
style guide</a> and <a
href="https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html">Google C++
style guide</a>.</li>
<li>Pass all linter checks. Please use <a
href="https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/format.sh"><code>format.sh</code></a>
to format your code.</li>
<li>The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors
can easily understand the code.</li>
<li>Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and
robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.</li>
<li>Please add documentation to <code>docs/source/</code> if the PR
modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user
understand and utilize the new features or changes.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Notes for Large Changes</h3>
<p>Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major
architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we
would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and
justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with <code>rfc-required</code>
and might not go through the PR.</p>
<h3>What to Expect for the Reviews</h3>
<p>The goal of the vLLM team is to be a <i>transparent reviewing
machine</i>. We would like to make the review process transparent and
efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated.
However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over
others. Here is what you can expect from the review process: </p>
<ul>
<li> After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer.
Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and
availability.</li>
<li> After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update
every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel
free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.</li>
<li> After the review, the reviewer will put an <code>
action-required</code> label on the PR if there are changes required.
The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to
re-review the PR.</li>
<li> Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a
comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask
for clarification or discuss the suggestion.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Thank You</h3>
<p> Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and
for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM
a great tool for everyone! </p>
</details>
prarit
pushed a commit
to prarit/vllm
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2024
* adding fp8 padding * fix linter * add padding size as a parameter of fp8 gemm
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Needs some additional testing