feat: pass platform from env variable or fall back to use old logic

[zdtsw]

Description

feat: pass platform from env variables or fall back to use old logic

- introduce new env var ODH_PLATFORM_TYPE, value set during build time
  - if value not match, fall back to detect managed then self-managed

introduce new env var OPERATOR_RELEASE_VERSION, value also set during build time
if value is empty, fall back to use old way from CSV to read version or use 0.0.0
add support from makefile
use envstubst to replace version
(split from #1231)

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

• You have read the contributors guide.
• Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
• Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

[ykaliuta]

I support the change. And it is backward compatible. Just worried about the formal process now.

[zdtsw]

i can markt it to [draft] for now and wait to see how / when we want it

[ykaliuta]

I support the change. And it is backward compatible. Just worried about the formal process now.

It was about original version where only platform was passed with environment.
Version is a different piece of information and I do not support using environment for that (it was already discussed in some other PR)

[zdtsw]

I support the change. And it is backward compatible. Just worried about the formal process now.

It was about original version where only platform was passed with environment. Version is a different piece of information and I do not support using environment for that (it was already discussed in some other PR)

i do not tend to get the version part out, but to run the full tests, i will need to get it from draft to PR to trigger ci.
for the "it was already discussed in some other PR", maybe i missed/dont recall that part , do you have a reference where the converstation ended?

[ykaliuta]

i do not tend to get the version part out, but to run the full tests, i will need to get it from draft to PR to trigger ci. for the "it was already discussed in some other PR", maybe i missed/dont recall that part , do you have a reference where the converstation ended?

Jira (13115) and probably slack actually. Looks like was ignored.

[zdtsw]

i do not tend to get the version part out, but to run the full tests, i will need to get it from draft to PR to trigger ci. for the "it was already discussed in some other PR", maybe i missed/dont recall that part , do you have a reference where the converstation ended?

Jira (13115) and probably slack actually. Looks like was ignored.

i removed the part for the release version

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ykaliuta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [ykaliuta]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (incubation@6134496). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/cluster/cluster_config.go	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             incubation    #1252   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage              ?   19.09%           
=============================================
  Files                 ?       30           
  Lines                 ?     2645           
  Branches              ?        0           
=============================================
  Hits                  ?      505           
  Misses                ?     2079           
  Partials              ?       61           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.