[RHOAIENG-12310] Error cases for storage class admin table

[jpuzz0]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-12310

Description

Show error/warning alerts for scenarios where individual storage class config values or the entire config are malformed in some way. Introduce abilities to correct those mistakes possibly made via the Openshift UI within the ODH dashboard's storage class table.

Unreadable config demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/86b3cda6-f5c4-41cf-bcdc-92f8787f9b61

Invalid data, default, enable config values:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/35a9d29c-f889-4101-a2f2-690fe4a8afbb

Invalid Display name demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/af5d969f-450c-4303-a1e5-3057554d114d

Invalid Description demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f4b14a3-b97f-4035-b24c-0f8d28a885b7

Invalid Display name and description demo:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fd6f80f-5590-42e9-b524-3c7db61c7b16

(cc @xianli123)

How Has This Been Tested?

1. Edit storage classes within in Openshift via /search/ns/opendatahub?q=&kind=storage.k8s.io~v1~StorageClass by clicking on individual row actions, Edit annotations, then update the opendatahub.io/sc-config value to force invalid data.

With the feature flag enabled, visit the storage class table's page; /storageClasses?devFeatureFlags=disableStorageClasses

2. Verify the cases outlined in the JIRA issue are covered and match the referenced designs.
3. Verify all storage class edit modals are updated according to how/where they were opened from.
4. Verify once updating a given row or individual cell that the data is reset and no longer considered "Corrupted".

Test Impact

Added cypress test covering multiple error cases

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.48%. Comparing base (b5351a7) to head (d9bd9a3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
frontend/src/pages/storageClasses/utils.ts	85.71%	2 Missing ⚠️
...rc/pages/storageClasses/CorruptedMetadataAlert.tsx	90.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...es/storageClasses/ResetCorruptConfigValueAlert.tsx	93.75%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3213      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.39%   85.48%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files        1277     1279       +2     
  Lines       28082    28159      +77     
  Branches     7487     7523      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits        23980    24071      +91     
+ Misses       4102     4088      -14     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../pages/storageClasses/StorageClassDefaultRadio.tsx	100.00% <ø> (+3.70%)	⬆️
...src/pages/storageClasses/StorageClassEditModal.tsx	94.44% <100.00%> (+2.44%)	⬆️
.../pages/storageClasses/StorageClassEnableSwitch.tsx	100.00% <ø> (+3.57%)	⬆️
...rc/pages/storageClasses/StorageClassesTableRow.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (+2.08%)	⬆️
...rc/pages/storageClasses/CorruptedMetadataAlert.tsx	90.00% <90.00%> (ø)
...es/storageClasses/ResetCorruptConfigValueAlert.tsx	93.75% <93.75%> (ø)
frontend/src/pages/storageClasses/utils.ts	91.66% <85.71%> (+1.66%)	⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b5351a7...d9bd9a3. Read the comment docs.

[Gkrumbach07]

looks good, just one comment

[xianli123]

Thanks! LGTM.

[Gkrumbach07]

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Gkrumbach07

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [Gkrumbach07]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment