Remove cypress suppression of uncaught exceptions

[manaswinidas]

Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-10715
Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-7565
Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-11444
Closes: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-11847

Description

These snippets had been introduced to work around a Patternfly bug with ExpandableSection patternfly/patternfly-react#10410 This has been fixed - removing these suppressions because they can hide other uncaught exceptions.

How Has This Been Tested?

• Run Cypress test files modelVersionArchive.cy.ts and registeredModelArchive.cy.ts and check whether they run fine.

Test Impact

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Commits have been squashed into descriptive, self-contained units of work (e.g. 'WIP' and 'Implements feedback' style messages have been removed)
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[mturley]

@manaswinidas it looks like we're still getting the exception - I think we need to upgrade PatternFly to pull in the fix.

According to this PR comment it was released in @patternfly/[email protected] but we're still on 5.3.3.

[manaswinidas]

Oops should have checked that. The tests are passing locally for me. Also, why is registeredModelsArchive.cy.ts not failing?

[mturley]

good question... looking into it. also I'm not sure why tests are passing for you locally... do you have the newer PF installed somehow?

[mturley]

I'm confused by the test failing on "after each" hook for "Restore from archive version details", I don't see an afterEach in there anywhere

[mturley]

The tests are passing for me locally too... I think maybe there's a rendering race condition and the exception isn't necessarily always thrown. Maybe we can just upgrade PF and make sure it passes and that's sufficient.

[manaswinidas]

@mturley @patternfly/[email protected] is still in pre-release according to npm versions history

[mturley]

/hold
holding this until PatternFly releases 5.4.0 and we can upgrade to that version in this PR. The Jira is blocked until that happens - The PatternFly team says the release is expected today. If there are further delays we'll need to roll over the issue to the next sprint.

[mturley]

Once PF releases and we unblock this, let's make sure to also remove the newly introduced instance of this in https://github.com/opendatahub-io/odh-dashboard/pull/3116/files#diff-cfd373dd2cc4bd02bbf6aa15837b2b82aed88e0ef783079334d738c8b22d6ceaR206-R208

[mturley]

Thanks @manaswinidas ! This was a fun one huh

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mturley

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [mturley]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mturley]

/unhold

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.22%. Comparing base (4a0626e) to head (2e0fc1d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...t/tables/pipelineRun/CustomMetricsColumnsModal.tsx	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3063      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.84%   85.22%   +4.38%     
==========================================
  Files        1243     1244       +1     
  Lines       27099    27117      +18     
  Branches     7144     7152       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        21907    23111    +1204     
+ Misses       5192     4006    -1186     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/components/SimpleSelect.tsx	93.47% <ø> (+8.69%)	⬆️
.../screens/RegisterModel/RegisteredModelSelector.tsx	100.00% <ø> (+6.25%)	⬆️
...t/tables/pipelineRun/CustomMetricsColumnsModal.tsx	7.14% <0.00%> (+4.76%)	⬆️

... and 595 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4a0626e...2e0fc1d. Read the comment docs.