-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 526
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
curvefs/client: Clarify val #2059
Conversation
good job @shentupenghui |
Signed-off-by: 申屠鹏会 <[email protected]>
curvefs/src/client/common/config.cpp
Outdated
&volumeOpt->allocatorOption.blockGroupOption.allocateOnce); | ||
|
||
if (volumeOpt->allocatorOption.type == "bitmap") { | ||
conf->GetValueFatalIfFail( | ||
"volume.bitmapallocator.size_per_bit", | ||
"volume.bitmapAllocator.size_per_bit", | ||
&volumeOpt->allocatorOption.bitmapAllocatorOption.sizePerBit); | ||
conf->GetValueFatalIfFail( | ||
"volume.bitmapallocator.small_alloc_proportion", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ditto
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
conf->GetValueFatalIfFail(
"volume.bitmapallocator.small_alloc_proportion",
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
im sry for missing one unchanged
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
conf->GetValueFatalIfFail( "volume.bitmapallocator.small_alloc_proportion",
done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good job, lets us wait the ci finished
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CI still running, is there some failure occured?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CI still running, is there some failure occured?
http://59.111.91.248:8080/job/opencurve_multijob/6935/
as you can see, there is running the failover test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the failover test log shows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
test loop mount umount | FAIL |
mount/umount error
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signed-off-by: 申屠鹏会 <[email protected]>
recheck |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good job, thank you for your contribution
Signed-off-by: 申屠鹏会 <[email protected]>
@Cyber-SiKu all done in the latest commit |
LGTM! |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: #2049
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
What's Changed:
How it Works:
also replace all related files
Side effects(Breaking backward compatibility? Performance regression?):
No
Check List