Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UBERON terms with 'nerve' in their name (part 1 of 2) #191

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

UlrikeS91
Copy link
Contributor

generation of terms is described in #133 and fully-automated (with minor clean-ups here and there)

Filtering:
any term with 'nerve' in name

Note: This is not to definitively group terms but to create smaller PRs with terms that are potentially related. Hopefully, this makes it easier to review but please do not request to remove terms because they do not fit into the grouping. Only consider whether or not they are suitable UBERONParcellations.

@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 added the request any request or update for instances that are not covered by Technique, ContentType or SANDS label label Jan 17, 2025
@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 requested review from lzehl and spieschnik January 17, 2025 15:28
@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 self-assigned this Jan 17, 2025
@UlrikeS91
Copy link
Contributor Author

UlrikeS91 commented Jan 17, 2025

EDIT (18.01.25): Split the PR into 2. Issue is not solved, just moved to #202.

The check is failing because of typos in 2 files. One was a typo in the definition provided trough UBERON and I fixed it in our files ('teh' instead of 'the').

But I'm not sure how to solve the other one. The spellcheck reacts to 'opthalamic nerve' which is listed as a synonym for 'ophthalamic' (extra h between op and thalamic). Technically, the spellcheck is correct because it is not commonly used. What should we do? remove it from the list of synonyms or ignore the spell check?

@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 changed the title UBERON terms with 'nerve' in their name UBERON terms with 'nerve' in their name (part 1 of 2) Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
request any request or update for instances that are not covered by Technique, ContentType or SANDS label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant