-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a datacenter resource. #1413
Add a datacenter resource. #1413
Conversation
1ae444e
to
eb6b348
Compare
2369cb4
to
01b85e3
Compare
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
This is a bit of an anti pattern ... stale because i haven't received a review? Also check failure is unrelated to this change. |
The purpose of this is to allow for people running in a hybrid environment.
10b7e40
to
48cfd1c
Compare
<!-- NOTE: THIS FILE IS AUTOGENERATED. DO NOT EDIT BY HAND. --> | ||
<!-- see templates/registry/markdown/attribute_namespace.md.j2 --> | ||
|
||
# DC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure it is a good idea to use the abbreviation here. I'd be more inclined to go with "Data Center" instead.
- id: dc.site | ||
type: string | ||
stability: experimental | ||
brief: 'Name of the datacenter site' | ||
note: > | ||
The name of the physical building. | ||
examples: ['site-1'] | ||
- id: dc.suite | ||
type: string | ||
stability: experimental | ||
brief: 'Name of the datacenter suite' | ||
note: > | ||
Typically the room in the building where the server cages are located. | ||
examples: ['suite-5'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a good case to reuse future geo
namespace #1116
I'd postpone adding those two since physical address is not a datacenter-specific thing and we need to be able to express it in a generic way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not necessarily related to geolocation it's relative to the building it's in.
stability: experimental | ||
brief: 'Type of datacenter' | ||
examples: ['cloud', 'colocation', 'internal'] | ||
- id: dc.device.type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we already have a few attributes that can describe a device id/name #1474 - is there some we can reuse instead of adding a new one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could see a scenario where you might need both a device ID and a hw component id in a parent child relationship. Maybe a server with a network card which you're measuring tx/rx.
- id: dc.cage | ||
type: string | ||
stability: experimental | ||
brief: 'Name of the cage' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a standard property described somewhere we can link to? Also, let's add an additional layer saying what it is. E.g. dc.cage.name
or dc.cage.id
so that there is a room to record different properties of the cage and also the attribute name is descriptive.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can multiply it. I could see people using one, either , both.
note: > | ||
This is a literal cage which is used to protect servers from potential intruders. | ||
examples: ['cage-1'] | ||
- id: dc.pod |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same as for the cage - please link some external documentation and also update the name to be more specific (dc.pod.name
, or dc.pod.id
or something else)
note: > | ||
This is a grouping of many servers typically several racks of servers. | ||
examples: ['pod-4'] | ||
- id: dc.chassis |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same here, please link docs and provide specific property in the name
type: resource | ||
name: dc | ||
brief: > | ||
Generic DataCenter infrastructure tagging. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should call out that it's intended for the telemetry that describes datacenters themselves (and not the user code running somewhere that data center)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Until we sort out Entity / Resource fully - I think you should be really explicit who looks up this data and reports it.
Is this something you want an SDK to fill out? This feels like something that belongs in an entity side-channel signal...
cc @tigrannajaryan (and rest of Entities SiG) for thoughts
brief: > | ||
Generic DataCenter infrastructure tagging. | ||
attributes: | ||
- id: dc.name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it may be better to spell this out, check out the attribute name abbreviation guidelines
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
Unstale please 🙏 bot |
| Attribute | Type | Description | Examples | [Requirement Level](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/general/attribute-requirement-level/) | Stability | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---| | ||
| [`cloud.provider`](/docs/attributes-registry/cloud.md) | string | Name of the cloud provider. | `alibaba_cloud`; `aws`; `azure` | `Recommended` | ![Experimental](https://img.shields.io/badge/-experimental-blue) | | ||
| [`dc.cage`](/docs/attributes-registry/dc.md) | string | Name of the cage [1] | `cage-1` | `Recommended` | ![Experimental](https://img.shields.io/badge/-experimental-blue) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should these be conditionally recommended based on availability?
Should these be opt-in or on by default?
E.g. do cloud providers give you this data?
|---|---|---|---|---|---| | ||
| [`cloud.provider`](/docs/attributes-registry/cloud.md) | string | Name of the cloud provider. | `alibaba_cloud`; `aws`; `azure` | `Recommended` | ![Experimental](https://img.shields.io/badge/-experimental-blue) | | ||
| [`dc.cage`](/docs/attributes-registry/dc.md) | string | Name of the cage [1] | `cage-1` | `Recommended` | ![Experimental](https://img.shields.io/badge/-experimental-blue) | | ||
| [`dc.name`](/docs/attributes-registry/dc.md) | string | Name of datacenter. | `dc-name` | `Recommended` | ![Experimental](https://img.shields.io/badge/-experimental-blue) | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do you get this information on a cloud?
is it correlated with cloud.availability_zone
or cloud.region
?
- id: dc.site | ||
type: string | ||
stability: experimental | ||
brief: 'Name of the datacenter site' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you outline more what this means and how to generate this field? Can I discover these from within a datacenter or do I need to look it up?
type: resource | ||
name: dc | ||
brief: > | ||
Generic DataCenter infrastructure tagging. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Until we sort out Entity / Resource fully - I think you should be really explicit who looks up this data and reports it.
Is this something you want an SDK to fill out? This feels like something that belongs in an entity side-channel signal...
cc @tigrannajaryan (and rest of Entities SiG) for thoughts
Autogenerated code is up-to-date. Still concerns around documentation of how to fill things out and interaction with other semconv attributes.
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on. |
The purpose of this is to allow for people running in a hybrid environment.
Relates #1409
Changes
Please provide a brief description of the changes here.
Note: if the PR is touching an area that is not listed in the existing areas, or the area does not have sufficient domain experts coverage, the PR might be tagged as experts needed and move slowly until experts are identified.
Merge requirement checklist
[chore]