Metrics prototype scenario

text/metrics/0146-metrics-prototype-scenarios.md

@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+# Scenarios for Metrics API/SDK Prototyping
+
+With the stable release of the tracing specification, the OpenTelemetry
+community is willing to spend more energy on metrics API/SDK. The goal is to get
+the metrics API/SDK specification to
+[`Experimental`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/versioning-and-stability.md#experimental)
+state by end of 5/2021, and make it
+[`Stable`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/versioning-and-stability.md#stable)
+before end of 2021:
+
+* By end of 5/31/2021, we should have a good confidence that we can recommend
+  language client owners to work on metrics preview release. This means starting
+  from 6/1/2021 the specification should not have major surprises or big changes
+  which would thrust the language client maintainers, and we start to recommend
+  client maintainers to implement it. We might introduce additional features but
+  there should be a high bar.
+
+* By end of 9/30/2021, we should mark the metrics API/SDK specification as
+  [`Feature-freeze`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/1afab39e5658f807315abf2f3256809293bfd421/specification/document-status.md#feature-freeze),
+  and focusing on bug fixing or editorial changes.
+
+* By end of 11/30/2021, we want to have a stable release of metrics API/SDK
+  specification, with multiple language SIGs providing RC (release candidate) or
+  [stable](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/9047c91412d3d4b7f28b0f7346d8c5034b509849/specification/versioning-and-stability.md#stable)
+  clients.
+
+In this document, we will focus on two scenarios that we use for prototyping
+metrics API/SDK. The goal is to have two scenarios which clearly capture the
+major requirements, so we can work with language client SIGs to prototype,
+gather the learnings, determine the scopes and stages. Later the scenarios can
+be used as examples and test cases for all the language clients.
+
+Here are the languages we've agreed to use during the prototyping:
+
+* C#
+* Java
+* Python
+
+In order to not undertake such an enormous task at once, we will need to have an incremental approach and divide the work into multiple
+stages:
+
+1. Do the end-to-end prototype to get the overall understanding of the problem
+   domain. We should also clarify the scope and be able to articulate it
+   precisely during this stage, here are some examples:
+
+    * Why do we want to introduce brand new metrics APIs versus taking a well
+      established API (e.g. Prometheus and Micrometer), what makes OpenTelemetry
+      metrics API different (e.g. Baggage)?
+    * Do we need to consider OpenCensus Stats API shim, or this is out of scope?
+
+2. Focus on a core subset of API, cover the end-to-end library instrumentation
+   scenario. At this stage we don't expect to cover all the APIs as some of them
+   might be very similar (e.g. if we know how to record an integer, we don't
+   have to work on float/double as we can add them later by replicating what
+   we've done for integer).
+
+3. Focus on a core subset of SDK. This would help us to get the end-to-end
+   application.
+
+4. Replicate stage 2 to cover the complete set of APIs.
+
+5. Replicate stage 3 to cover the complete set of SDKs.
+
+## Scenario 1: Grocery
+
+The **Grocery** scenario covers how a developer could use metrics API and SDK in
+a final application. It is a self-contained application which covers:
+
+* How to instrument the code in a vendor agnostic way
+* How to configure the SDK and exporter
+
+Considering there might be multiple grocery stores, the metrics we collect will
+have the store name as a dimension - which is fairly static (not changing while
+the store is running).
+
+The store has plenty supply of potato and tomato, with the following price:
+
+* Potato: $1.00 / ea
+* Tomato: $3.00 / ea
+
+Each customer has a unique name (e.g. customerA, customerB), a customer could
+come to the store multiple times. Here goes the Python snippet:
+
+```python
+store = GroceryStore("Portland")
+store.process_order("customerA", {"potato": 2, "tomato": 3})
+store.process_order("customerB", {"tomato": 10})
+store.process_order("customerC", {"potato": 2})
+store.process_order("customerA", {"tomato": 1})
+```
+
+When the store is closed, we will report the following metrics:
+
+**Order info:**
+
+| Store    | Customer  | Number of Orders | Amount (USD) |
+| -------- | --------- | ---------------- | ------------ |
+| Portland | customerA | 2                | 14.00        |
+| Portland | customerB | 1                | 30.00        |
+| Portland | customerC | 1                | 2.00         |
+
+**Items sold:**
+
+| Store    | Customer  | Item   | Count |
+| -------- | --------- | ------ | ----- |
+| Portland | customerA | potato | 2     |
+| Portland | customerA | tomato | 4     |
+| Portland | customerB | tomato | 10    |
+| Portland | customerC | potato | 2     |
+
+## Scenario 2: HTTP Server
+
+The _HTTP Server_ scenario covers how a library developer X could use metrics
+API to instrument a library, and how the application developer Y can configure
+the library to use OpenTelemetry SDK in a final application. X and Y are working
+for different companies and they don't communicate. The demo has two parts - the
+library (HTTP lib owned by X) and the server app (owned by Y):
+
+* How developer X could instrument the library code in a vendor agnostic way
+  * Performance is critical for X
+  * X doesn't know which metrics and which dimensions will Y pick
+  * X doesn't know the aggregation time window, nor the final destination of the
+    metrics
+* How developer Y could configure the SDK and exporter
+  * How should Y hook up the metrics SDK with the library
+  * How should Y configure the time window(s) and destination(s)
+  * How should Y pick the metrics and the dimensions
+
+### Library Requirements
+
+The library developer (developer X) will provide two libraries:
+
+* Server climate control library - a library which monitors and controls the
+  temperature and humidity of the server.
+* HTTP server library - a library which provides HTTP service.
+
+Both libraries will provide out-of-box metrics, the metrics have two categories:
+
+* Push metrics - the value is reported (via the API) when it is available, and
+  collected (via the SDK) based on the ask from consumer(s). If there is no ask
+  from the consumer, the API will be no-op and the data will be dropped on the
+  floor.
+* Pull metrics - the value is always available, and is only reported and
+  collected based on the ask from consumer(s). If there is no ask from the
+  consumer, the value will not be reported at all (e.g. there is no API call to
+  fetch the temperature unless someone is asking for the temperature).
+
+#### Server Climate Control Library
+
+Note: the **Host Name** should leverage [`OpenTelemetry
+Resource`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/resource/sdk.md),
+so it should be covered by the metrics SDK rather than API, and strictly
+speaking it is not considered as a "dimension" from the SDK perspective.
+
+**Server temperature:**
+
+| Host Name | Temperature (F) |
+| --------- | --------------- |
+| MachineA  | 65.3            |
+
+**Server humidity:**
+
+| Host Name | Humidity (%) |
+| --------- | ------------ |
+| MachineA  | 21           |
+
+#### HTTP Server Library
+
+**Received HTTP requests:**
+
+Note: the **Client Type** is passed in via the [`OpenTelemetry
+Baggage`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/baggage/api.md),
+strictly speaking it is not part of the metrics API, but it is considered as a
+"dimension" from the metrics SDK perspective.
+
+| Host Name | Process ID | Client Type | HTTP Method | HTTP Host | HTTP Flavor | Peer IP   | Peer Port | Host IP   | Host Port |
+| --------- | ---------- | ----------- | ----------- | --------- | ----------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- |
+| MachineA  | 1234       | Android     | GET         | otel.org  | 1.1         | 127.0.0.1 | 51327     | 127.0.0.1 | 80        |
+| MachineA  | 1234       | Android     | POST        | otel.org  | 1.1         | 127.0.0.1 | 51328     | 127.0.0.1 | 80        |
+| MachineA  | 1234       | iOS         | PUT         | otel.org  | 1.1         | 127.0.0.1 | 51329     | 127.0.0.1 | 80        |
+
+**HTTP server request duration:**
+
+Note: the server duration is only available for **finished HTTP requests**.
+
+| Host Name | Process ID | Client Type | HTTP Method | HTTP Host | HTTP Status Code | HTTP Flavor | Peer IP   | Peer Port | Host IP   | Host Port | Duration (ms) |
+| --------- | ---------- | ----------- | ----------- | --------- | ---------------- | ----------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ------------- |
+| MachineA  | 1234       | Android     | GET         | otel.org  | 200              | 1.1         | 127.0.0.1 | 51327     | 127.0.0.1 | 80        | 8.5           |
+| MachineA  | 1234       | Android     | POST        | otel.org  | 304              | 1.1         | 127.0.0.1 | 51328     | 127.0.0.1 | 80        | 100.0         |
+
+### Application Requirements
+
+The application owner (developer Y) would only want the following metrics:
+
+* Server temperature - reported every 5 seconds
+* Server humidity - reported every minute
+* HTTP server request duration, reported every 5 seconds, with a subset of the
+  dimensions:
+  * Host Name
+  * HTTP Method
+  * HTTP Host
+  * HTTP Status Code
+  * Client Type
+  * 90%, 95%, 99% and 99.9% server duration
+* HTTP request counters, reported every 5 seconds:
+  * Total number of received HTTP requests
+  * Total number of finished HTTP requests
+  * Number of currently-in-flight HTTP requests (concurrent HTTP requests)
+
+  | Host Name | Process ID | HTTP Host | Received Requests | Finished Requests | Concurrent Requests |
+  | --------- | ---------- | --------- | ----------------- | ----------------- | ------------------- |
+  | MachineA  | 1234       | otel.org  | 630               | 601               | 29                  |
+  | MachineA  | 5678       | otel.org  | 1005              | 1001              | 4                   |
+* Exception samples (exemplar) - in case HTTP 5xx happened, developer Y would
+  want to see a sample request with trace id, span id and all the dimensions
+  (IP, Port, etc.)
+
+  | Trace ID                         | Span ID          | Host Name | Process ID | Client Type | HTTP Method | HTTP Host | HTTP Status Code | HTTP Flavor | Peer IP   | Peer Port | Host IP   | Host Port | Exception            |
+  | -------------------------------- | ---------------- | --------- | ---------- | ----------- | ----------- | --------- | ---------------- | ----------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | -------------------- |
+  | 8389584945550f40820b96ce1ceb9299 | 745239d26e408342 | MachineA  | 1234       | iOS         | PUT         | otel.org  | 500              | 1.1         | 127.0.0.1 | 51329     | 127.0.0.1 | 80        | SocketException(...) |