Introduce version variables for erlang docs #2989
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chalin
previously requested changes
Jul 7, 2023
cool, I was wondering the same, I guess java is doing that and I somehow missed it |
|
@chalin fixed |
ferd
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2023
cartermp
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2023
|
Alright I did a fuckywucky with the refcache somehow in another PR, so the red in this PR is a false negative. I'm just going to merge it and then fix my mess up |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Similar to what we have for Java & Collector already this pushes the versions used in erlang docs to the page front matter. This is only an intermediate step, in a further update we should have those taken from
data/