Use Deployment Environment in Resources' README instead of Environment.

[carlosalberto]

Follow up of #606

CHANGELOG entry is also added.

[Oberon00]

It was explicitly discussed that "stage" is not an ideal name, and "deployment environment" is better. E.g. you might have more than one environment per stage. Please do not change the meaning subtly by inventing a new name here. "Tier" was also discussed and discarded for the same reason. See discussion here, were both "stage" and "tier" were considered and rejected #606 (comment)

[carlosalberto]

@Oberon00 Updated. Re-review please.

[ecourreges-orange]

Thanks all for the followup and previous merge, I was on vacation.

[carlosalberto]

@bogdandrutu You ok with Deployment Environment? ;)

[bogdandrutu]

should then the semantic be:
deployment_environment.name?

[Oberon00]

I think the semantic convention is probably fine as it is. But maybe the heading structure should actually be:

• Cloud
• Deployment
• Kubernetes

without putting Kubernetes under Deployment.

[bogdandrutu]

That is also an option :)

[carlosalberto]

@Oberon00 Heading structure of this document (README.md) or the convention itself?

[carlosalberto]

Ping @Oberon00

[Oberon00]

I was talking about the TOC but the actual structure should most likely match that.

[carlosalberto]

I'm lost at this moment at what you guys expect ;) Please elaborate on what you want to see here regarding:

1. The TOC.
2. The actual semantic convention.

I don't have a special preference, and personally think the way it stands now (with this PR) is just fine, but I'm open to suggestions.

[Oberon00]

I'm also lost 😄

I think the current PR is fine and we can clean this up with #559

[bogdandrutu]

Please update the title of the PR

[carlosalberto]

Merging as this PR has the initial feedback that was left from #606 - remaining bits may be further refined through #559 (as @Oberon00 mentioned).