Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revise and extend semantic conventions for databases #575
Revise and extend semantic conventions for databases #575
Changes from 8 commits
ccd4a07
31efbd9
3207ed5
b2d335e
f999d31
b86ec24
050039d
ccefcfc
4b6e149
096a7a6
685bc4e
dd22c79
26ceb4f
3c22ce2
15d7c76
6f517d4
163b20c
72c6a19
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think any of these can be required. Instrumentation may not know any of that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This requirement was already there before, I just added the attributes to the table so they're not overlooked that easily.
An instrumentation should be able to capture it, otherwise there will only be little value if the database is unknown. In which cases would it not know about that, given that we expect instrumentation to be built-in into the database client library?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yurishkuro ping ^^^
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After #653, maybe this can be updated in a follow-up (or as part of #653). As of now, it seems there is not much point in bikeshedding over required vs recommended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instrumentation may not know anything about ports.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yurishkuro see the response to your comment above #575 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
knowledge of in-process vs. external DB my be abstracted away from instrumentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yurishkuro see the response to your comment above #575 (comment)