-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 896
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove the need to maintain third party propagators. #1144
Remove the need to maintain third party propagators. #1144
Conversation
@carlosalberto I will submit a proposal by EOD tomorrow. Can you postpone removal until the maintainers have a chance to discuss? |
Works, let's do that for now ;) |
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
@alolita any progress? Can we merge this? |
@alolita ping |
Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the softer wording! 😄
Co-authored-by: (Eliseo) Nathaniel Ruiz Nowell <[email protected]>
…1144) * Remove the need to mantain third party propagators. * Update the docs to be more liberal. * Update specification/context/api-propagators.md Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]> * Update specification/context/api-propagators.md Co-authored-by: (Eliseo) Nathaniel Ruiz Nowell <[email protected]> * Remove the mention of XRay propagator. Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: (Eliseo) Nathaniel Ruiz Nowell <[email protected]>
Initial addressing of #1047
Changes
OTel repos won't initially contain any third party propagator (such as OT or AWS). @alolita will do the related follow-up, but this is a first step to put us back in the original agreement.