Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add process.signals_pending metric to semantic conventions #2826

Closed
andrzej-stencel opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Add process.signals_pending metric to semantic conventions #2826

andrzej-stencel opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions [label deprecated] triaged-needmoreinfo [label deprecated] The issue is triaged - the OTel community needs more information to decide spec:metrics Related to the specification/metrics directory

Comments

@andrzej-stencel
Copy link
Member

What are you trying to achieve?

I want to add a process.signals_pending metric to the semantic conventions.

Additional context.

If I understand correctly, this metric is useful to see if/when a process stopped accepting signals, which can be useful in investigating issues.

Telegraf exposes this metric in its procstat input plugin. Adding a semantic convention for this metric in OT should make migration from Telegraf to OpenTelemetry easier.

Related proposal to add this metric in the hostmetrics receiver: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib#14084.

@andrzej-stencel andrzej-stencel added the spec:metrics Related to the specification/metrics directory label Sep 23, 2022
@reyang reyang added the [label deprecated] triaged-needmoreinfo [label deprecated] The issue is triaged - the OTel community needs more information to decide label Sep 23, 2022
@reyang
Copy link
Member

reyang commented Sep 23, 2022

These all make sense, but please pause for now, we are considering refactoring existing semantic conventions. Please come to ongoing discussions. See #2753.

@andrzej-stencel
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this issue as the pull request has been rejected #2846.

@andrzej-stencel andrzej-stencel closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions [label deprecated] triaged-needmoreinfo [label deprecated] The issue is triaged - the OTel community needs more information to decide spec:metrics Related to the specification/metrics directory
Projects
None yet
3 participants