test: use rstest for table testing sdk resource

[pitoniak32]

fixes: #2384

Changes

Described more in the aboved linked issue. But the goal here is using rstest to improve the test writing experience and allow for tests to have multiple cases in a more readable format.

Merge requirement checklist

• CONTRIBUTING guidelines followed
• Unit tests added/updated (if applicable)
• Appropriate CHANGELOG.md files updated for non-trivial, user-facing changes
• Changes in public API reviewed (if applicable)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.3%. Comparing base (540cdb3) to head (a31828e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #2407     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   79.3%   79.3%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files        123     123             
  Lines      21566   21535     -31     
=======================================
- Hits       17112   17082     -30     
+ Misses      4454    4453      -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cijothomas]

LGTM!

[cijothomas]

@open-telemetry/rust-approvers Please share your thoughts. We try to avoid any external dependency in the shipped code, but for tests/infra, this is acceptable.

[TommyCpp]

I always favor table driven test methods so 👍 on this change

[lalitb]

much cleaner. I anticipate it would be more helpful for metrics tests.