Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add comments about StartTimeUnixNano #295
Add comments about StartTimeUnixNano #295
Changes from 11 commits
eda7485
7e9029b
5b6abcb
03b2d36
3dfeba0
fd4d374
bbe3959
351cfa1
ad79ff1
a8761df
55eb417
5951df4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the interest of both getting this PR in, and ensuring information is easily found, Would It make sense to move the depiction of unbroken sequences and start time synthesis into the DataModel specificaiton (with a link from here) rather than in the proto file?
a. We may evolve/improve the description.
b. This isn't a great medium for delivering "why" content.
My mantra for this file is "What, not why", and for the DataModel specification is "Why then What" (i.e. Justification, then Specification semantics).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK; will do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 @jsuereth also we make sure we don't duplicate specification and get one of them outdated