Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop OTLP exponential histogram environment variable option #5290

Conversation

jack-berg
Copy link
Member

Drop support for the otel.exporter.otlp.metrics.default.histogram.aggregation option EXPONENTIAL_BUCKET_HISTOGRAM, which is superseded by BASE2_EXPONENTIAL_BUCKET_HISTOGRAM.

@jack-berg jack-berg requested a review from a team March 10, 2023 20:08
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (351108e) 90.97% compared to head (0bc6f52) 90.97%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #5290      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     90.97%   90.97%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     4907     4906       -1     
============================================
  Files           552      552              
  Lines         14489    14488       -1     
  Branches       1372     1371       -1     
============================================
- Hits          13182    13181       -1     
  Misses          907      907              
  Partials        400      400              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...metry/sdk/autoconfigure/ResourceConfiguration.java 94.87% <ø> (ø)
...lemetry/exporter/internal/otlp/OtlpConfigUtil.java 89.84% <100.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@jkwatson jkwatson merged commit e2817eb into open-telemetry:main Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants