-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 773
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[di-tracing] Fix the TracerProviderBuilder.AddInstrumentation factory pattern extension #4468
Merged
CodeBlanch
merged 4 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
CodeBlanch:tracing-addinstrumentation-factory-fix
May 8, 2023
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you describe more or give an example of what happened if you used this before the fix? I'm assuming
builder
is a different instance thantracerProviderBuilder
, and so callingAddInstrumentation
had no effect?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't tell if you are asking me to explain that here or in the CHANGELOG 🤣 I'll start with just here...
Correct! Calling it before this fix it will just no-op.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So
tracerProviderBuilder
instance is notITracerProviderBuilder
, but thebuilder
instance is? Then, what about the same check inConfigureServices
? Do we need to worry about that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's 2 builders...
TracerProviderBuilderBase
this is the phase 1 builder. ImplementsITracerProviderBuilder
. Dumps everything into theIServiceCollection
.TracerProviderBuilderSdk
this is the phase 2 builder which holds the state. Everything from phase 1 is re-played against this builder onceIServiceProvider
is available in the order it was registered. The state then gets consumed into theTracerProviderSdk
.The working version of the clause is...
The first part (
is ITracerProviderBuilder iTracerProviderBuilder
) is true for bothTracerProviderBuilderBase
&TracerProviderBuilderSdk
.The second part (
iTracerProviderBuilder.Provider != null
) is the more interesting one! OnlyTracerProviderBuilderSdk
has access to theIServiceProvider
. During phase 1 we operate on theIServiceCollection
. During phase 2IServiceCollection
has been closed and we have theIServiceProvider
.The way the code was written before it was capturing the "phase 1" builder (
TracerProviderBuilderBase
) so the second clause would evaluate tofalse
even when the final "phase 2" builder was in play.Yes, this is confusing 😢
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both 😆, appreciate the explanation here, but I also think elaborating in the changelog (or at least the PR description) would be good as it might help users determine if they're impacted.
It does not appear that any of our instrumentation is using this particular overload of
AddInstrumentation
, so I'd imagine that end users who may be impacted by this bug are ones that are using this overload in some kind of DI scenario.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the CHANGELOG text to be more specific. LMK if you want it to be more verbose. I'll also spin up an issue for this and link to it from the PR description.