Update changelog for release #3108
Conversation
|
@alanwest need one more approval, to see if the new naming pattern (to undo/limit the damage from previous naming pattern) looks okay |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I was personally excited about rc10 since I had one of these as a kid... bummer it didn't work well with semver.
| @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Unreleased | |||
|
|
|||
| ## 1.2.0-rc4 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So we're hedging that we don't make it to 10 - let's hope not 😆
| @@ -10,7 +10,11 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Unreleased | |||
|
|
|||
| ## 1.0.0-rc10 | |||
| ## 1.0.0-rc9.1 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Had to re-up my memory of semver. 👍 this checks out:
I think 1.0.0-rc9.1 is good for this release. I put in 1.0.0-unstable.1 as a potential proposal in the future, specifically for instrumentation packages. "unstable" being the term the spec uses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about 1.0.0-rc31415926535897932384626... similar to what TeX did.
Following the pattern described in #2991 (comment)