We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove extensions methods related to the BCL (string!) classes. It could be noisy for Intellisense,
Describe the solution you'd like:
Consider methods like
internal static JaegerExportProtocol? ParseProtocol(string value)
or
internal static bool ParseProtocol(string value, out JaegerExportProtocol result)
instead of
public static JaegerExportProtocol? ToJaegerExportProtocol(this string protocol) =>
Describe alternatives you've considered.
Which alternative solutions or features have you considered?
Based on #2875 (comment) and #2914 (review)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yun-Ting
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Feature Request
Remove extensions methods related to the BCL (string!) classes. It could be noisy for Intellisense,
Describe the solution you'd like:
Consider methods like
or
instead of
Describe alternatives you've considered.
Which alternative solutions or features have you considered?
Additional Context
Based on #2875 (comment) and #2914 (review)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: