Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disambiguate component ID in 'connectortest' package #7110

Merged

Conversation

djaglowski
Copy link
Member

Use a different ID than receivertest and exportertest to avoid ambiguous configuration scenarios. Ambiguous IDs are detected in the otelcol package, but lower level packages such as service assume that IDs are disambiguated.

To demonstrate this working with the connectors feature gate enabled, I've temporarily updated the gate level to beta. Once tests pass, I will revert the gate level to alpha.

@djaglowski djaglowski changed the title Disambiguate component ID in connectorstest Disambiguate component ID in 'connectortest' package Feb 3, 2023
@djaglowski djaglowski added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Feb 3, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 90.59% // Head: 90.59% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (02ef83c) compared to base (c3d5b3b).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7110   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.59%   90.59%           
=======================================
  Files         293      293           
  Lines       14250    14254    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        12910    12914    +4     
  Misses       1072     1072           
  Partials      268      268           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
connector/connectortest/connector.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@djaglowski
Copy link
Member Author

@djaglowski djaglowski marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2023 18:35
@djaglowski djaglowski requested review from a team and dmitryax February 3, 2023 18:35
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu merged commit 93bc338 into open-telemetry:main Feb 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants