-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle partial success responses in the OTLP HTTP exporter #6970
Handle partial success responses in the OTLP HTTP exporter #6970
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6970 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.14% 90.90% -0.24%
==========================================
Files 298 300 +2
Lines 14915 15082 +167
==========================================
+ Hits 13594 13711 +117
- Misses 1045 1097 +52
+ Partials 276 274 -2
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
5ae21fb
to
876ab4b
Compare
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
876ab4b
to
f8b6719
Compare
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
I think we need a rebase in order to pass the mandatory 1.20 check. |
f8b6719
to
55818cc
Compare
55818cc
to
fb462c4
Compare
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
14bf1ab
to
a97b2a6
Compare
a97b2a6
to
50f3dba
Compare
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
50f3dba
to
005ed26
Compare
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
005ed26
to
10760d9
Compare
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
@dmitryax Could you please take a look at this one as well? I believe this PR is also ready to go. |
10760d9
to
e769070
Compare
e769070
to
978f348
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Just one minor suggesting
LGTM? We're currently hitting partial success responses and this will definitely help us investigate |
Description:
Handle partial success messages returned from OTLP HTTP backends.
Link to tracking Issue:
Fixes #6686
Testing:
Unit tests. I was able to manually test partial success messages when submitting metrics to a vendor backend. I'd welcome any additional places to test this.