Rename [Traces|Metrics|Logs]Consumer to [Traces|Metrics|Logs]

[bogdandrutu]

Updates #2759

Signed-off-by: Bogdan Drutu [email protected]

[bogdandrutu]

/cc @Aneurysm9

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2761 (364a287) into main (3660f5c) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 88.88%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2761   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.83%   91.83%           
=======================================
  Files         291      291           
  Lines       15522    15524    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        14254    14256    +2     
  Misses        867      867           
  Partials      401      401           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
component/componenttest/nop_exporter.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
component/componenttest/nop_processor.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
component/componenttest/nop_receiver.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
consumer/consumertest/err.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
consumer/consumertest/nop.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
consumer/consumertest/sink.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
consumer/fanoutconsumer/cloningconsumer.go	57.57% <ø> (ø)
exporter/exporterhelper/factory.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
internal/testcomponents/example_exporter.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
processor/attributesprocessor/factory.go	82.60% <ø> (ø)
... and 40 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3660f5c...364a287. Read the comment docs.

[tigrannajaryan]

This is worse than before. It is not clear what this Metrics is since it is a very generic word. I do not mind renaming the type names but if we do that we must ensure embedded structs become fields so that they have a proper name otherwise readability of the code suffers.

[bogdandrutu]

I do agree that embedded fields are not best named in this situation, I would still do the change because it is more go standard way to name things like this. Do you mind if I look into this in a followup?