-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[admin] Add criteria for distributions #376
[admin] Add criteria for distributions #376
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Pablo Baeyens <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one comment. Otherwise LGTM. Thank you @TylerHelmuth for putting this together!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great, thanks!!
distributions/README.md
Outdated
@@ -2,16 +2,17 @@ | |||
|
|||
Support for a distribution implies all the duties covered by the Approver and Maintainer role requirements. In addition, support means that the Collector SIG is the owner and maintainer of the binaries/images of the different Collector distributions and is responsible for the pipeline that produces those artifacts. | |||
|
|||
The Collector SIG must support at least one distribution that is recommended for production which includes support for Prometheus, Jaeger, Zipkin, and OpenCensus. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Jaeger and OpenCensus will be deprecated and removed at some point. Will we update this one later or better rephrase it now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I say we update it once we aren't being held to that expectation. As far as I am aware we still are. @jpkrohling can you confirm?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They will be, but they are not yet. I'd keep them here, and remove when time comes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, just small wording suggestions. Thanks for writing this.
Co-authored-by: Evan Bradley <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Evan Bradley <[email protected]>
This PR adds the explicit criteria that a distribution must meet in order to be included in this repository.
Works towards #360